Governor: The Commonwealth of Ellenburg

WA Delegate: None.

Founder: Endolantron

Last WA Update:

Maps Board Activity History Admin Rank

Largest Automobile Manufacturing Sector: 237th Most Rebellious Youth: 257th Largest Publishing Industry: 358th+36
Largest Welfare Programs: 428th Most Advanced Public Education: 491st Lowest Crime Rates: 680th Smartest Citizens: 682nd Most Advanced Law Enforcement: 728th Healthiest Citizens: 745th Most Patriotic: 753rd Most Beautiful Environments: 803rd Best Weather: 826th Highest Economic Output: 839th Largest Governments: 887th Nicest Citizens: 949th Most Cultured: 950th Most Advanced Defense Forces: 1,048th Most Extensive Public Healthcare: 1,068th Most Advanced Public Transport: 1,165th Most Accessible: 1,188th Most Popular Tourist Destinations: 1,198th Most World Assembly Endorsements: 1,199th Most Devout: 1,254th Most Valuable International Artwork: 1,266th Most Developed: 1,392nd Largest Black Market: 1,569th Most Eco-Friendly Governments: 1,579th Highest Poor Incomes: 1,623rd Most Authoritarian: 1,673rd Longest Average Lifespans: 1,701st Most Compassionate Citizens: 1,709th Highest Food Quality: 1,966th Most Scientifically Advanced: 2,038th Highest Average Tax Rates: 2,077th Largest Manufacturing Sector: 2,302nd Highest Average Incomes: 2,848th Most Nations: 2,878th Largest Arms Manufacturing Sector: 3,026th Most Corrupt Governments: 3,296th
World Factbook Entry

Founded on April 29ᵗʰ, 2005 and peaking between 2007 and 2009, Autropolis remains an active yet quiet region that aims to provide a home among the stars; itself a star cluster orbiting a massive black hole. A plethora of unexplored systems and habitable planets await future settlement.


LinkDISCORD SERVER - We'd appreciate if you used your nation name when you've joined our Discord Server!

LinkModern Forum | History of Autropolis | Embassy Policy


BULLETIN:

As of 2026-05-01, Autropolis is under new management!
It has been decided that new nations should be recruited to Autropolis via recruitment telegrams.



  1. 4

    Autropolis - Statement from the Secretary Chancellor

    BulletinNews by Solariia . 167 reads.

  2. 45

    United Regions Alliance

    BulletinPolicy by URA Public Affairs . 4,383 reads.

  3. 2

    Embassy Policy [AUT]

    MetaGameplay by Echoslavia . 152 reads.

  4. 2

    Chancery of the Government of Autropolis

    MetaGameplay by Solariia . 155 reads.

▼ 1 More

Map

This is the map of Autropolis created by Lorium . It has 0 estimated diplomatic weight behind it, the most in Autropolis. It is one of 1 maps of Autropolis.

Embassies: URA, The Exalted Lands, The Forgotten Lands, The Bar on the corner of every region, OmniOne, The Dimensional Rift, The United Caribbean Island Alliance, The Great Experiment, Region Name, The Border Commune, The United Ascendancy, The United Federations, Mariner Trench, Krasnaya, Dawn, Entropy, and 7 others.Venice, The United Empires of Carson, Anteria, Krillin, The United Federation of Planets, Philippines, and Regionless.

Tags: Casual, Democratic, FT: FTL, Featured, Future Tech, Minuscule, Multi-Species, Offsite Chat, Offsite Forums, Outer Space, Regional Government, and World Assembly.

Autropolis contains 5 nations, the 2,878th most in the world.

Today's World Census Report

The Most Influential in Autropolis

World Census experts spent many evenings loitering in the corridors of power in order to determine which nations were the greatest international diplomacy heavyweights.

As a region, Autropolis is ranked 7,408th in the world for Most Influential.

NationWA CategoryMotto
1.The Commonwealth of EllenburgAuthoritarian Democracy“Cleaning up what other's won't!”
2.The Alcazar of Kalique AbrasaxAnarchy“Earth is a very small part of a very large industry.”
3.The Unified Empire of Chaos incarceratedPsychotic Dictatorship“Let Chaos Be Your Peace”
4.The Holy Socialist Imperium of New LaudesiaPsychotic Dictatorship“Deus magnus, cervisia bona, homines insaniunt.”
5.The Most Serene United Kingdom of BordoriaLeft-wing Utopia“Libertas, Iustitia, Fraternitas”

Regional Happenings

More...

Autropolis Regional Message Board

Hello, Autropolis friends!

The URA recommends a non-binding vote AGAINST Repeal: “Freedom to Read and Learn” by a vote of 24.18% FOR, 29.85% AGAINST, and 17.25% ABSTAIN.

Please see (and upvote!) our recommendation:


URA World Assembly Recommendation

Repeal: “Freedom to Read and Learn”
General Assembly Resolution #234 “Freedom to Read and Learn” (Category: Civil Rights; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

There are some resolutions, wholesome and unobjectionable in nature, that pass this Assembly by very wide margins. These resolutions feel good to write, feel good to vote for, and feel good when they pass. Feel-good resolutions seem innocuous. When done carelessly, however, one author’s little pork project can transform into another nation’s slaughterhouse.

The target's sole binding provision is as follows: "No person shall be punished for reading, nor for enabling oneself and/or another to read, nor for acquiring knowledge and/or cultural enrichment from non-readable media or reading media adapted for individuals with disabilities, provided that the material was legally published with the intention that it be publicly available."

  1. Theft of library books or computers happens to be one means by which one could engage in "enabling oneself and/or another to read." The target effectively gives people free rein to steal devices that can access literary works and burgle buildings that contain them, so long as at least one accessible or contained work "was legally published with the intention that it be publicly available." Something being publicly available does not mean there should be no restrictions on acquiring or accessing it.

  2. The target's mandate is results-based and extremely broad. Put differently, "enabling oneself and/or another to read" does not take intent into account. In every incident similar to the ones detailed above, authorities must determine whether the perpetrator's actions enabled them or anyone else to read any applicable material, regardless of what their intention was or what crime they allegedly committed. This has the deranged effect of randomizing justice and imposing inane overhead on law enforcement.

  3. The target's test depends on the intention of a work's publisher, not its distributor or acquirer. As long as potentially dangerous reading materials such as bombmaking instructions, classified information, or extremist recruiting materials, or even just pirated or stolen content, are legally published in some jurisdiction, even a nonmember or a rogue state, with the intent that they be publicly available, members are powerless to protect their people from them.

In seeking to protect the principle of reading and learning, the target instead leaves people unprotected and endangered by the consequences of its poorly crafted language. As pointless fluff, the target offers minimal benefits while lending itself to inordinate damage. The good that would be done by repealing it far outweighs the good of leaving it intact, and it is fitting that a feel-good resolution can be struck by a feel-good repeal.

Co-authors: Halsoni, Noton Mast, Pallaith

This General Assembly resolution was authored by Cretox State and aims to repeal GAR#234, Freedom to Read and Learn.

The United Regions Alliance recommends that you vote AGAINST this resolution

This resolution seeks to repeal GAR#234, legislation originally intended to defend the free access to literature and written material of WA member state citizens. The repeal argues that the thirteen-year-old resolution's single active clause is inadequate to handle the various niche cases which exist in the modern world, and legalises what would otherwise be severe criminal activity in many WA member states. The URA, however, does not believe that these harms caused by the resolution's flaws outweigh its benefits in defending the ability of WA member state citizens to freely access literature and religion. Instead, believing that a reasonable interpretation of the resolution does not permit the legalisation of theft or espionage, and given these arguments, the URA urges a vote AGAINST this resolution.

Arguments from members of the URA included:

Battadia wrote:A rather unfortunate reading of the OR, but nevertheless one I agree with. Support for a rather defining final resolution to pass the GA.



Internal voting results

Turnout: 7/12 Members
Weighted turnout: 71.28%


This document was authored by Battadia on behalf of the United Regions Alliance. Please do not reproduce it without permission.
Read dispatch

Hello, Autropolis friends!

The URA recommends a non-binding vote FOR Repeal: “Liberate The Crown Dependency of Hong Kong” by a vote of 72.01% FOR, 0% AGAINST, and 0% ABSTAIN.

Please see (and upvote!) our recommendation:


URA World Assembly Recommendation

Repeal: “Liberate The Crown Dependency of Hong Kong”
Security Council Resolution #483 “Liberate The Crown Dependency of Hong Kong” shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

The Security Council,

Remembering The Crown Dependency of Hong Kong a small, fledgling, frontier colony of Empire of Great Britain, which became embattled in late 2023 as barbarous forces from beyond the region’s borders invaded and took control of the region,

Recognizing that during this period of instability and strife, this esteemed council passed a liberation to preserve the region and its community,

Understanding that following the invasion, the community of The Crown Dependency disbanded and its nations returned back to their mother region which chose other avenues for developing its community and pursuing growth in the frontiers,

Acknowledging that the liberation has outlived its original purpose, and now acts as a barrier preventing its former community from reclaiming the space and protecting it,

Seeking to allow the former community to reclaim and preserve their former home,

Repeals Liberate The Crown Dependency of Hong Kong.

Co-authors: Mar Teret, Her Majesty Queen Victoria, Gagium

This Security Council resolution was authored by One Small Island and aims to repeal SCR#483, Liberate The Crown Dependency of Hong Kong.

The United Regions Alliance recommends that you vote FOR this resolution

This resolution seeks to repeal SCR#524, which liberated The Crown Dependency of Hong Kong due to the region's occupation by hostile forces. As pointed out in the repeal, however, the region has since been restored to its rightful residents, and thus the injunction is now an active hindrance. The URA agrees that the injunction should be retired, and urges a vote FOR this resolution.

Arguments from members of the URA included:

Battadia wrote:Ooh hey an OSI proposal, she's cool
The natives want this, easy support.



Internal voting results

Turnout: 7/12 Members
Weighted turnout: 72.01%


This document was authored by Battadia on behalf of the United Regions Alliance. Please do not reproduce it without permission.
Read dispatch

Only 5 remaining countries. We must grow!

Hello, Autropolis friends!

The URA recommends a BINDING vote FOR "Daybreak" by a vote of 57.43% FOR, 25.22% AGAINST, and 4.99% ABSTAIN.

Please see (and upvote!) our recommendation:


URA World Assembly Recommendation

Daybreak
Forum debate
Day breaks on a new General Assembly. Whether through something as baroque as an arcane ritual or as pedestrian as a loose power cord, the old institution is no more and its volume of standing resolutions has been wiped clean.

Thus, it is our privilege and duty as sovereign members of this body of NationStates to forge a new international order. The new General Assembly must seize this opportunity at this critical juncture in history, and learn from the legacy of its predecessor to secure a new vision for the future that centers the needs and sovereignty of its constituents.

In pursuit of those lofty and necessary goals, the General Assembly hereby recognizes the following realities:

  1. This new General Assembly is the successor to the one of old, whose resolutions no longer have effect.

  2. Member nations are considered competent to manage their own affairs. They possess sovereignty over matters within their jurisdiction, including the ability to freely engage with international affairs.

  3. In exercising their sovereignty, member nations may choose to cede it, such as by adopting and implementing resolutions passed by this body or participating in regional or other supranational units.

  4. The World Assembly must maintain infrastructure necessary for the execution of its functions and responsibilities, such as administrative bureaucracy and funding mechanisms.

For the benefit of members and future legislative efforts, the General Assembly additionally recognizes the following distinctions:

  1. There is a distinction between resolution effects that are Assembly-wide, such as the establishment of agencies or reservation of powers, and effects that are member nation-specific due to flowing from a member nation's obligations under resolutions it adopts.

  2. In its capacity as an expression of the collective will of its member nations, the General Assembly expresses collective positions and commitments through resolutions it passes. However, individual member nations subscribe to those positions and commitments by adopting the relevant resolutions.

Based on those realities, and in order to begin the great work of establishing foundational infrastructure for the vibrant legislative efforts sure to come, the General Assembly enacts the following:

  1. Member nations possess formal equality under World Assembly law.

  2. Member nations must make a good-faith effort to fulfill their obligations under General Assembly resolutions they adopt.

When one chapter ends, another begins. It is time for the General Assembly to usher in a new age of international relations, and to forge a new, better legacy. This body looks forward to the coming era, and eagerly awaits what its members will accomplish. Together, we can improve the world, one resolution at a time.

Co-authors: Walkabout, Ghost, Halsoni

World Census Analysis
W I N N E R S
PatriotismSafety
L O S E R S
Political Apathy
World Census analysis assumes a typical nation. Individual results may vary.

This General Assembly resolution was authored by Cretox State and lays out the groundwork upon which the new General Assembly shall be built.

The United Regions Alliance recommends that you vote FOR this resolution

This resolution acknowledges the metamagical destruction of the Legacy General Assembly, and establishes various basic principles for new and continuing member states, as well as the General Assembly, to follow. Member states are recognised as sovereign and equal under General Assembly legislation, and in turn are required to comply in good faith with said General Assembly legislation. Import is also given to the new compliance method, which enables member states to choose which parts of the corpus shall apply in their jurisdiction. The URA agrees with these principles, and commends this first resolution to its rightful place at the apex of the new General Assembly, and thus urges a vote FOR this resolution.

Arguments from members of the URA included:

Suvmia wrote:I like that there has been some thought to a statement upon the beginning of a new set of legislation, whether or not I agree on the groundwork of natsov principles.

Tomington wrote:As a first proposal, it's good imo. It's pretty decent at laying out the vision for the new GA. Does it lean into the term sovereignty a bit too much? Yes, but it's fine. The actual juice of the proposal is what i'd expect

Rykkland wrote:I am ambivalent about its passage, but for an international organisation which is set to develop regulations by which most nations will be required to enforce else lose their rights, focusing at all on anything beyond the lofty goals of the organisation itself seems like a strikeout.
It would have been nice if the first resolution was less a description of the new mechanics and more a declaration of intent or action
but I also believe that lack of action is a cessation of import and given I personally didn't think about the idea of a new first resolution until one hit the desk, makes me think that something is better than nothing.



Internal voting results

Turnout: 8/12 Members
Weighted turnout: 87.64%


This document was authored by Battadia on behalf of the United Regions Alliance. Please do not reproduce it without permission.
If you have been mentioned in this document and would like to avoid such an occurrence in future, please message here. URA Delegates, as tagged below, may not take advantage of this.
Read dispatch

Hello, Autropolis friends!

The URA recommends a non-binding vote FOR "National Sovereignty" by a vote of 44.39% FOR, 17.83% AGAINST, and 0% ABSTAIN.

The URA also recommends a BINDING vote FOR "Repeal: “Injunct The Crown Dependency of Hong Kong”" by a vote of 67.21% FOR, 0% AGAINST, and 0% ABSTAIN.

Please see (and upvote!) our recommendations:


URA World Assembly Recommendation

National Sovereignty
Forum debate
The General Assembly's primary mission is to improve the world, one resolution at a time. It does so through the collective action and in accordance with the collective will of World Assembly members.

Such efforts should not come at the undue expense of national sovereignty. If anything, upholding and protecting members' sovereignty is one of the purest goals this body can aspire to.

Therefore, the General Assembly hereby recognizes World Assembly member nations to be competent to manage their own affairs, and to possess sovereignty over matters within their jurisdiction unless ceded, including:

  • Authority over internal affairs, such as promulgating and enforcing internal policies.

  • Free engagement in external affairs, including entry into international agreements and association with regional and other supranational units.

In order to better uphold national sovereignty, the General Assembly hereby declares the following to be obligations of the World Assembly to its member nations in executing its responsibilities and functions under World Assembly law:

  • The World Assembly must afford its member nations a presumption of regularity; it must assume its member nations act in good faith and properly execute their obligations under World Assembly law absent clear evidence otherwise.

  • In promulgating policy or resolving ambiguity that affects a given member nation, the World Assembly must extend due deference to the interests and reasonable interpretation of that member.

  • The World Assembly may not impose undue or impractical burdens on its member nations.

  • In exercising authority within a member nation's jurisdiction, the World Assembly must, where appropriate and practical, interface with the member's government rather than commandeering internal government processes or sub-jurisdictions.

Additionally, the General Assembly urges:

  • Member nations to collaborate in good faith on issues of a cross-border or borderless nature, such as public health, environmental policy, and trade.

  • This body's legislative efforts to focus on issues of international character or relevance.

While member nations can and do cede their sovereignty through their participation in the World Assembly, national sovereignty remains a bedrock principle of this body. Member nations should have discretion in how they exercise and cede their sovereignty, and this body should aim to preserve it where practical.

Co-authors: Walkabout, Ghost, Islandwalk

World Census Analysis
W I N N E R S
Patriotism
L O S E R S
Political Apathy
World Census analysis assumes a typical nation. Individual results may vary.

This General Assembly resolution was authored by Cretox State and establishes the ways and means by which national sovereignty shall be preserved by the new General Assembly

The United Regions Alliance recommends that you vote FOR this resolution

This resolution states that the preservation of national sovereignty, the ability of member states to manage their own affairs, is one of the General Assembly's primary objectives, over the furtherance of international federalism. It leaves implementation of General Assembly legislation to the appropriate organs of member states, and additionally recognises and supports non-General-Assembly means by which issues may be resolved. The URA agrees with these these arguments, and thus urges a vote FOR this resolution.

Arguments from members of the URA included:

Battadia wrote:Against due to concept, on a fundamental level I believe that the international should supersede the national.

Lycos wrote:For due to concept, on a fundamental level I believe that the national should supersede the international.

Tomington wrote:I am categorically against this; the only reason this proposal exists is to forward the NatSov movement in the most shameless way possible. We can argue the merits of the actual text if you want; but, at the end of the day, this is simply a ploy to have their ideology written into a resolution, there's no intent to legislate anything here.

Rykkland wrote:I think from an IC perspective, I would probably vote for this resolution as an NS nation, but from a meta perspective, it seems odd to me, I state again, to step into the first forays of a new international body mechanic with the intention of expressing that one should not use it. I'm just not convinced, even if NatSov/IntFed opposition is interesting and therefore overall good, that a NatSov perspective winning control of the narrative immediately in the new reset is healthy for the mechanic nor therefore the game.



Internal voting results

Turnout: 5/12 Members
Weighted turnout: 62.22%


This document was authored by Battadia on behalf of the United Regions Alliance. Please do not reproduce it without permission.
If you have been mentioned in this document and would like to avoid such an occurrence in future, please message here. URA Delegates, as tagged below, may not take advantage of this.
Read dispatch



URA World Assembly Recommendation

Repeal: “Injunct The Crown Dependency of Hong Kong”
Forum debate
Security Council Resolution #484 “Injunct The Crown Dependency of Hong Kong” shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

The Security Council,

Recalling the conflict that embroiled The Crown Dependency of Hong Kong at the end of 2023, in which the fledgling community, a colony of Empire of Great Britain, was invaded and suppressed by hostile forces from beyond their borders prompting intervention from this council in the form of an injunction,

Saddened that following the conflict the community chose to withdraw from the region, and pursue their ambitions elsewhere leaving the region uninhabited and with no native community in need of protection,

Acknowledging that with no community present within its borders the region has become a wasteland that serves only as a target for the ill-intentioned opportunists that lurk beyond the region’s borders,

Affirming that the former community would like to secure the region and keep it safe against predation,

Recognizing that the injunction now serves only to prevent the once native community from securing and protecting their region,

Hereby repeals “Injunct The Crown Dependency of Hong Kong”

Co-authors: Croblade, Flydale North, God-Empress Makasta Silversbane

This Security Council resolution was authored by One Small Island and aims to repeal SCR#484, Injunct The Crown Dependency of Hong Kong.

The United Regions Alliance recommends that you vote FOR this resolution

This resolution seeks to repeal SCR#484, which injuncted The Crown Dependency of Hong Kong due to the region's occupation by hostile forces. Much like its immediate predecessor, Repeal: “Liberate The Crown Dependency of Hong Kong”, this repeal argues that the region has since been restored to its rightful residents, and thus the injunction is now an active hindrance. The URA agrees that the injunction should be retired, and urges a vote FOR this resolution.

Arguments from members of the URA included:

Battadia wrote:The partner to ⁠Link[PASSED] Repeal: “Liberate The…, easy support.



Internal voting results

Turnout: 7/12 Members
Weighted turnout: 67.21%


This document was authored by Battadia on behalf of the United Regions Alliance. Please do not reproduce it without permission.
If you have been mentioned in this document and would like to avoid such an occurrence in future, please message here. URA Delegates, as tagged below, may not take advantage of this.
Read dispatch

Hello, Autropolis friends!

The URA recommends a non-binding vote FOR "World Assembly Governance Standards" by a vote of 37.29% FOR, 17.62% AGAINST, and 12.26% ABSTAIN.

The URA recommends a BINDING vote FOR "Commend Fooooooooo" by a vote of 55.74% FOR, 0.00% AGAINST, and 11.73% ABSTAIN.

Please see (and upvote!) our recommendations:


URA World Assembly Recommendation

World Assembly Governance Standards
Forum debate
The World Assembly,

Well aware of its newly-minted status of international body, serving tens of thousands of nations worldwide, and the responsibility that comes alongside dutiful oversight of these nations, and

Wishing to establish an early standard of respect within this institution, and between members, which preserves the autonomy of individual members of this body while still being capable of accomplishing policy goals of international significance, therefore

Enacts as follows:

  1. All binding actions taken by this Assembly ought to satisfy each of the following conditions:

    1. the subject matter presents a collective action problem that member nations cannot adequately address through independent domestic action, fundamental rights that transcend national sovereignty, or some other transboundary concern;

    2. the scope and intrusiveness of the resolution does not exceed what is reasonably necessary to address the identified concern; and

    3. among the available policy approaches capable of achieving the resolution's objective, the approach chosen is the least burdensome on the domestic governance of member nations, with respect to current understanding of how that is best accomplished.

  2. No binding action shall be taken by this body that impedes the sovereign right of members to determine their own constitutional order, or otherwise mandates or prohibits the adoption of any particular form of government, political system, or governing ideology. No resolution should govern a matter which is purely domestic in character and would violate clause 1 of this resolution.

  3. In all areas of policy which do not have explicit, active resolutions or clauses governing them, it is to be presumed that the World Assembly reserves governance of this issue to individual members, or independent coalitions of members, where applicable, for their policy assessment.

  4. Member nations are expected to extend good faith recognition of domestic policy choices of other members in areas which are not covered by the World Assembly or other relevant treaties, consistent with clause three of this resolution. This clause should not be construed to restrict member governments or officials from expressing political opinion regarding the domestic policies of other members.

Co-author: Heavens Reach

World Census Analysis
W I N N E R S
Patriotism
L O S E R S
Political Apathy
World Census analysis assumes a typical nation. Individual results may vary.

This General Assembly resolution was authored by Bisofeyri World Assembly Mission and aims to provide rules for future General Assembly legislation to follow.

The United Regions Alliance recommends that you vote FOR this resolution

This resolution requires that new General Assembly legislation only be written on matters where international cooperation is truly necessary, and requires that the World Assembly take action in the least obtrusive manner possible. It also makes clear that nations have sovereignty over all areas where the General Assembly has not explicitly legislated. Some URA members noted that certain clauses of the resolution were flawed, as detailed in the discussion below, but on the whole the URA finds that the aims achieved by this resolution outweigh the harms caused by its flaws, and thus urges a vote FOR this resolution.

Arguments from members of the URA included:

Battadia wrote:Toothless due to the contradiction rule being destroyed, and I feel like clause 1a could've been broken out into a sublist. Clause 3 is patently obvious, and clause 4 is just kind of weird. Still, I don't majorly object to it, weak support.

Agladnare wrote:"All binding actions taken by this Assembly ought to satisfy each of the following conditions: the subject matter presents... fundamental rights that transcend national sovereignty.

No binding action shall be taken by this body that impedes the sovereign right of members to determine their own... governing ideology."

This might be picky, but without a clear definition to "governing ideology", this two clause can contradict each other, no?

For example, the next resolution is Eliminating Slavery And Trafficking Of Persons. What if a member nation has a slaver ideology? The World Assembly can't interfere with their governing ideology, but at the same time can bind them to act against it? Since it's a matter of fundamental rights?

Zorgazia wrote:That clause is contradictory and a bit vague I'd say.



Internal voting results

Turnout: 6/12 Members
Weighted turnout: 67.17%


This document was authored by Battadia on behalf of the United Regions Alliance. Please do not reproduce it without permission.
If you have been mentioned in this document and would like to avoid such an occurrence in future, please message here. URA Delegates, as tagged below, may not take advantage of this.
Read dispatch



URA World Assembly Recommendation

Commend Fooooooooo
Forum debate
The Security Council,

Observing the utopian haven of Fooooooooo, resting in the quaint realm of Balder, and resolving to unearth the vital role the nation’s leader, Fuzzy the Owl, has played in developing the Balderan identity,

Starting with Fuzzy’s entry into Balderan politics in 2012, at that time a hotbed of conflicts due to the community’s nascent status, and their election into the Storting (the region’s parliament); they became one of the chief drivers of activity in the legislature through their equanimous engagements with their colleagues, soon assuming the post of Talman (Speaker) due to this demeanor,

Understanding that Fuzzy then went on to become one of the longest serving and most impactful Talmans in the region’s history; chief amidst their numerous achievements in the position is their orchestration of Balder’s peaceful transition to a monarchy in 2013, allowing the fledging Balderan community to breath a sigh of relief for the first time since its inception,

Uncovering Fuzzy’s adventures as one of Balder’s premier hosts of carnivals and jamborees, where the interregional community first came to interact with the Foooooooooan leader’s puntastic ways through events like Dragons of the Frozen Sea, a bilateral festival jointly hosted with The West Pacific (TWP) to celebrate the start of a new, enduring relationship between the two regions,

Noticing a pattern about Fuzzy’s admirable drive to improve the Balderan society, best exemplified through their work as the Minister of Integration of Balder; under their guidance, new integration and retention practices were implemented that resulted in the Delegate’s endorsement count soaring from just above 100 to almost 200, amplifying the region’s voice in the World Assembly,

Analyzing Fuzzy’s investiture into Balder’s esteemed nobility as the Crown Prince (Vice Delegate) to North East Somerset following the latter’s first coronation as King; apart from aiding in the strengthening of regional security (a task they dutifully continue to this day), they served as one of the primary impetuses behind constitutional reforms that separated the roles of head of state (King) and head of government (Statsminister), boosting the efficiency of the government and leading to the formation of the modern Balderan executive that has persevered into the modern era,

Recalling Fuzzy’s pioneering stint as the first Statsminister of Balder, where they set a high bar for all subsequent Statsministers through their exemplary work; they laid down the administrative foundations of the newly-created position which helped their successors ease into the role and would later return in the post in 2020 to restore stability into the region in the aftermath of Operation Heimdall, an internal plot to overthrow Balder’s sitting government,

Investigating Fuzzy’s momentary detour into the fabled land of Albion, which they helped to discover and spread the word of as one of its original settlers; it was thanks to their efforts that Albion ballooned to over 400 nations within a short period of time, allowing the community to flourish on an unprecedented level,

Reliving the magical culture Fuzzy helped curate during their stay in Albion, guided by the wisdom acquired from their early Balder days; Albion throughout its existence came to be known as a domain of unbridled whimsy, partly due to the dazzling fests Fuzzy helped organize like:

  • the Royal Festival, which celebrated the conclusion of the first-ever elections held in the realm,

  • the Falling Leaves Festival, which honored the coming of autumn in a multiverse-spanning revelry and saw over a thousand posts lodged onto the regional forums as a result, and,

  • the Solstice Celebration, a jointly-held gala with Europeia which commemorated the signing of the Treaty of Friendship between the two regions,

Returning to Balder, where Fuzzy proved themselves to be a consummate diplomat, devoted towards bettering the region’s transborder standing, by:

  • revitalizing relations with TWP, already a long-standing ally, which saw the two regions come closer than ever before,

  • supporting The East Pacific during Fedele’s failed coup, and negotiating the Treaty of Aarhus with the community immediately after, and,

  • thawing long-cold ties with The South Pacific by brokering the Pact of the Centre of the Earth, marking a shift in Balderan foreign policy by making peace with former defender rivals,

Rejoicing at Fuzzy’s ascension to the throne of Balder as King, the culmination of a decade of impeccable servitude towards the region; during their reign, Fuzzy spearheaded fundamental legislative reforms that incentivized citizen participation and led Balder to war against adherents of Raider Unity for their aggression against allies,

Believing that Fuzzy’s awe-inspiring dedication towards Balder and its interests deserves recognition from this august assembly,

Hereby commends Fooooooooo.

Co-authors: North East Somerset, Millenhaal

This Security Council resolution was authored by Emodea and aims to commend Fooooooooo.

The United Regions Alliance recommends that you vote FOR this resolution

This resolution seeks to commend Fooooooooo on the grounds of their extensive tenure in the government of Balder, and the multitude of accomplishments that their leadership has brought. The resolution goes on to applaud the efforts of Fooooooooo in Albion, and congratulate them on their ascension as King of Balder. The URA agrees that such extensive service should be recognised, and urges a vote FOR this resolution.

Arguments from members of the URA included:

Battadia wrote:An extensive list of accomplishments, seems well-deserved to me. Support.



Internal voting results

Turnout: 5/12 Members
Weighted turnout: 67.47%


This document was authored by Battadia on behalf of the United Regions Alliance. Please do not reproduce it without permission.
If you have been mentioned in this document and would like to avoid such an occurrence in future, please message here. URA Delegates, as tagged below, may not take advantage of this.
Read dispatch

Hello, Autropolis friends!

The URA recommends a BINDING vote FOR "Eliminating Slavery and Trafficking of Persons" by a vote of 55.68% FOR, 0% AGAINST, and 0% ABSTAIN.

Please see (and upvote!) our recommendation:


URA World Assembly Recommendation

Eliminating Slavery and Trafficking of Persons
Forum debate
The World Assembly,

Seeing that slavery and the trade of sapient beings is a significant threat to the well-being of individuals, communities, and worlds throughout the multiverse,

Recognizing that noble efforts were undertaken in outlawing these barbaric practices since nearly the beginning of the historic General Assembly,

Now hoping to follow in those footsteps and ban such practices once more in a concise and straightforward manner,

Definitions:

  1. “Slavery” is a state of servitude in which a natural person or other entity exercises the powers of ownership over another person;

  2. “Forced labour” is a system of labour which is forced upon a natural person under threat of harm or penalty and against the will of the labourer, excluding the following cases:

    1. National service applying to a large fraction of the national population, using conscription based on objective factors, and limited in period to at most half of an individual's life expectancy;

    2. Dire and particular circumstances, where not working significantly risks danger to others;

    3. If the labourer agrees with informed and prior consent to labour for a fixed and finite term or quantity;

  3. “Trafficking” as the sale or transfer of persons for the purpose of forced or slave labour, or the facilitation of such a transfer;

Mandates:

  1. Slavery, trafficking, and forced labour are prohibited in all member states;

  2. Ownership of any person is not legally recognized in member states;

  3. Member nations shall facilitate the consensual repatriation of trafficked persons to other member nations;

  4. The World Assembly is to impose comprehensive sanctions against states recognizing legal slavery and trafficking.

Co-author: Picairn

World Census Analysis
W I N N E R S
EqualityCompassionNiceness
L O S E R S
Economic FreedomEmploymentRudeness
P O L I C I E S   C A N C E L L E D
Slavery No Emigration

World Census analysis assumes a typical nation. Individual results may vary.


This General Assembly resolution was authored by Islandwalk and aims to prohibit slavery and the trafficking of persons in member states.

The United Regions Alliance recommends that you vote FOR this resolution

This resolution absolutely prohibits slavery, the trafficking of persons, and forced labour within World Assembly member states, as per the definitions of those terms. It also requires the repatriation of trafficked persons discovered within member states, and the sanctioning of nations which participate in slavery and the trafficking of persons. Some URA members noted various weak points in the resolutions and areas where, in their opinion, it should be strengthened, but on the whole the URA finds that the aims achieved by this resolution outweigh the harms caused by its flaws, and thus urges a vote FOR this resolution.

Arguments from members of the URA included:

Battadia wrote:I for one think slavery is bad. Although, I don't much like clause 2c, I would prefer a "limited in period to at most half of an individual's life expectancy" or similar limitation like in clause 2a. Additionally, consent in clause 2c should be required to be freely given, as well. Furthermore, I don't really like mandate 3 as it allows nations to force consent and then ship out trafficked persons to some third country. Should be, at minimum, the same consent requirements as in (my ideal) clause 2c of free, prior, and informed consent.
Still, something is better than nothing, support.



Internal voting results


This document was authored by Battadia on behalf of the United Regions Alliance. Please do not reproduce it without permission.
If you have been mentioned in this document and would like to avoid such an occurrence in future, please message here. URA Delegates, as tagged below, may not take advantage of this.
Read dispatch

Hello, Autropolis friends!

The URA recommends a BINDING vote FOR "World Environmental Treaty" by a vote of 72.67% FOR, 0% AGAINST, and 0% ABSTAIN.

Please see (and upvote!) our recommendation:


URA World Assembly Recommendation

World Environmental Treaty
Forum debate
The World Assembly,

Recognizing that issues of transboundary nature, of which environmental degradation is among the most consequential, are a salient concern for this Body to address, as no member state alone can fully address damages arising therefrom, and

Convinced that the long-term sustainability of shared ecosystems and the pursuit of economic development are inalienable rights of this Assembly’s members best considered as complementary, not competing, objectives to be navigated according to each member’s individual circumstances and capabilities, and

Noting that, following the annihilation of the body previously occupying this space, no extant WA entity serves to coordinate endeavors of environmental concern nor facilitate the international exchange of environmental information, hereby enacts as follows:

  1. The World Assembly establishes the following guiding principles, in the hope that they will be respected and upheld by all members:

    1. Pursuant to international law, each member has the right to exploit the resources within their jurisdiction and the responsibility to ensure that such exploitation does not cause undue environmental harm to the jurisdiction of other members without their consent;

    2. Where there is a risk for significant or long-term environmental damage from state action or inaction, uncertainty of the possibility of such damage should not preclude reasonable efforts to prevent environmental damage;

    3. In cases where a member causes undue or preventable transboundary environmental harm to a neighboring member’s jurisdiction, the member responsible is also responsible for the cost of the infringement, accounting for feasibility, public interest, international trade, and other circumstantial considerations;

    4. When undertaking environmental initiatives, members ought to endeavor to equitably consider the needs of the current generation and future generations;

    5. Due to the varying circumstances, needs, and capabilities of members, each individual member has different and corresponding responsibilities to prevent and mitigate global environmental degradation;

    6. Individuals in members are entitled to be made aware of environmental proceedings which may reasonably affect them, including but not limited to health, safety, and quality of life risks from environmental degradation of any scale;

    7. Member-driven exploitation of the environment ought to be undertaken in a manner that maintains the long-term ecological viability of its components and does not cause significant degradation to adjacent, dependent, or intertwined ecosystems; and

    8. Members and their people ought to work together in good faith on environmental initiatives, especially where transboundary implications are entailed.

  2. The Environmental Coordination Office (ECO) is hereby founded to aid members in their pursuit of environmental endeavors and response to environmental events. ECO shall be bound by the following duties and obligations, but shall not have the ability to compel a member into action or inaction unless further empowered by future resolutions:

    1. Regularly monitor global environmental markers, including but not limited to greenhouse gas emissions, ambient air quality, freshwater availability, and global biodiversity, and shall provide these measurements free of charge to all member governments;

    2. Coordinate with member governments on national and subnational environmental monitoring endeavors, striving to standardize environmental data measurement and reporting guidelines;

    3. Provide reasonable technical and logistical assistance to member governments suffering environmental damages or working on environmental projects upon request;

    4. Facilitate the exchange of pertinent information between members who may otherwise have difficulty exchanging such information, for example due to diplomatic tensions;

  3. Upon becoming aware of an event within their jurisdiction that poses a credible risk of significant transboundary environmental harm, such as the large-scale release of pollutants, acute ecosystem collapse, or hazardous contamination of waterways or airsheds, members will notify ECO and any other potentially affected parties under World Assembly jurisdiction as soon as possible.

  4. Any body established by future World Assembly legislation to address environmental matters should, unless that legislation specifies otherwise, either operate as a subsidiary body under ECO's administrative coordination or maintain a formally coordinated relationship with ECO, and shall work to ensure coherence among World Assembly environmental policy and the principles established herein.

Co-author: The Ankhalic Vaspriot

World Census Analysis
W I N N E R S
TourismForeign AidEnvironmental Beauty
L O S E R S
Political ApathyEconomic FreedomIndustry: Pizza Delivery

World Census analysis assumes a typical nation. Individual results may vary.


This General Assembly resolution was authored by Bisofeyri World Assembly Mission and aims to protect the environment of member states from harm.

The United Regions Alliance recommends that you vote FOR this resolution

This resolution establishes principles regarding how member states should work to prevent major economic damage, the spread of environmental harm across borders, and several other matters. It also requires that member state citizens be informed of environmental degradation which could affect them. Additionally, the resolution establishes the Environmental Coordination Office to host and coordinate future World Assembly legislation on environmental matters, and mandates that the Environmental Coordination Office collect, provide, and coordinate environmental data. The URA supports these aims and methods, and thus urges a vote FOR this resolution.

Arguments from members of the URA included:

Battadia wrote:Very intfed, support.

Lycos wrote:Actually not very intfed, the scale and topic are perfectly appropriate for an international body. Support.

Tomington wrote:I do very much like the establishment of the ECO as a monitoring organization. I think it's a nice touch and could very readily be used for future resolutions



Internal voting results

Turnout: 6/12 Members
Weighted turnout: 72.67%


This document was authored by Battadia on behalf of the United Regions Alliance. Please do not reproduce it without permission.
If you have been mentioned in this document and would like to avoid such an occurrence in future, please message here. URA Delegates, as tagged below, may not take advantage of this.
Read dispatch

Hello, Autropolis friends!

The URA recommends a non-binding vote FOR "International War Crimes Convention" by a vote of 39.03% FOR, 27.06% AGAINST, and 0% ABSTAIN.

Please see (and upvote!) our recommendation:


URA World Assembly Recommendation

International War Crimes Convention
Forum debate
The General Assembly,

RECOGNIZING that armed conflict causes immense and unnecessary suffering among civilians;

AFFIRMING that humane conduct in warfare and the protection of civilians are vital principles of international law;

ACKNOWLEDGING that serious violations of moral and humanitarian norms during armed conflict should be recognized as war crimes;

SEEKING to establish standards for the protection of civilians, protected persons, medical operations, and evidence relating to such crimes;

Hereby establishes the following standards regarding war crimes and the conduct of warfare:

  1. Defines “civilian” as any individual who is not a member of armed forces or otherwise directly participating in hostilities;

  2. Civilians are not legitimate military targets unless directly participating in hostilities, and combatants must distinguish between civilians and military objectives while taking reasonable precautions to minimize civilian harm when engaging lawful military targets;

  3. Actions intended to terrorize civilian populations are prohibited, including attacks, threats, demonstrations of violence, or military operations intended to spread fear, intimidation, or severe physical harm among civilians;

  4. Defines “civilian infrastructure” as facilities primarily supporting civilian life, including housing, humanitarian shelters, medical facilities, water, electrical, food, and sanitation systems;

  5. Targeting civilian infrastructure is prohibited unless it directly and substantially contributes to military operations and its destruction, capture, or neutralization would provide a definite military advantage;

  6. Medical facilities retain special protection unless used for hostile military-related purposes beyond their humanitarian function;

  7. The deliberate use of civilians, the wounded and sick, or protected civilian infrastructure to shield military objectives from attack is prohibited, including placing military forces or material among them for that purpose;

  8. The starvation of civilian populations as a method of warfare is prohibited, including deliberate deprivation or destruction of resources vital for civilian survival and wellbeing;

  9. Individuals captured or detained during armed conflict must be treated humanely, including:

    1. protection from torture, cruel treatment, or degrading treatment;

    2. access to food, water, shelter, and medical care sufficient to preserve basic health and survival, to the greatest extent reasonably practicable and without adverse distinction;

    3. protection from execution or punishment solely on the basis of nationality, civilian status, or lawful service in an opposing armed force, except following lawful judicial process and conviction for a specific criminal offense;

    4. protection from being taken or held as hostages;

  10. Military officials, civilian authorities, or other persons exercising effective authority over combatants or military operations shall be held responsible for war crimes committed by subordinates where they knew, or reasonably should have known, that such crimes were being committed or likely to be committed, and failed to take reasonable measures within their authority to prevent, stop, report, or punish such acts;

  11. The wounded and sick, meaning individuals rendered incapable of fighting by wounds or sickness, whether military or civilian, must not be attacked, denied protection, or deprived of adequate medical care except by legitimate medical priority;

  12. Medical personnel, medical transport, and exclusively humanitarian medical operations must not be targeted or obstructed unless used beyond their humanitarian function for hostile military-related purposes;

  13. Member states shall take reasonable and feasible measures to preserve evidence in their possession or control relating to credible allegations of war crimes, including documentation of civilian harm, preservation of relevant battlefield evidence, and cooperation with investigations;

  14. Establishes the World Assembly War Crimes Documentation Commission, tasked with collecting and maintaining records of alleged war crimes reported by member states, assisting with documentation and evidence preservation, and publishing periodic reports summarizing international news and trends relating to violations of this Convention.

World Census Analysis
W I N N E R S
Civil RightsWelfareCompassion
L O S E R S
Social ConservatismPolitical ApathyAuthoritarianism

World Census analysis assumes a typical nation. Individual results may vary.


This General Assembly resolution was authored by The Orwell Society and aims to establish basic definitions and prohibitions within the context of war crimes.

The United Regions Alliance recommends that you vote FOR this resolution

This resolution establishes various prohibitions on military activity, including attacks on civilians, civilian infrastructure, medical facilities, and the wounded and sick. It also prohibits the use of starvation in a military context, as well as the mistreatment of prisoners of war and the use of terrorism against civilians. Furthermore, the resolution establishes the World Assembly War Crimes Documentation Commission, and requires that all member states protect any evidence obtained that indicates the occurrence of war crimes. The URA supports these aims and methods, and thus urges a vote FOR this resolution.

Arguments from members of the URA included:

Battadia wrote:It's a bit spotty, but something is better than nothing. Support.

Agladnare wrote:"Targeting civilian infrastructure is prohibited unless it directly and substantially contributes to military operations and its destruction, capture, or neutralization would provide a definite military advantage."

Against due to the clause above.



Internal voting results

Turnout: 6/12 Members
Weighted turnout: 66.09%


This document was authored by Battadia on behalf of the United Regions Alliance. Please do not reproduce it without permission.
If you have been mentioned in this document and would like to avoid such an occurrence in future, please message here. URA Delegates, as tagged below, may not take advantage of this.
Read dispatch

Hello, Autropolisian friends!

The URA recommends a BINDING vote AGAINST "Bodily Autonomy and Informed Consent" by a vote of 4.28% FOR, 62.97% AGAINST, and 7.05% ABSTAIN.

Please see (and upvote!) our recommendation:


URA World Assembly Recommendation

Bodily Autonomy and Informed Consent
Forum debate
Bodily Autonomy and Informed Consent

The General Assembly,

Recognizing that individuals retain inherent rights over their own bodies and personal autonomy,

Affirming that informed consent is a fundamental component of ethical medical practice and the protection of human dignity,

Concerned that the absence of clear international standards may enable coercive, harmful, or non‑consensual medical practices,

Determined to establish foundational protections while preserving the ability of member nations to administer their own medical systems,

Hereby enacts the following:

1. Definitions

For the purposes of this resolution:

a. “Medical intervention” means any procedure, treatment, examination, or action that directly affects an individual’s bodily integrity.

b. “Informed consent” means voluntary, revocable agreement to a medical intervention, given after the individual has been provided reasonably accessible information about the nature, purpose, risks, benefits, and alternatives of the intervention.

c. “Coercion” means any threat, penalty, manipulation, or undue pressure that would reasonably compromise an individual's ability to freely consent.

d. “Emergency circumstances” means situations in which delaying medical intervention would pose an imminent threat to an individual’s life or risk severe and immediate harm.

e. “Incapacitated individual” means any person who, due to age, unconsciousness, cognitive impairment, or other condition recognized by the member nation, cannot meaningfully provide informed consent.

f. “Responsible authority” means any medical professional or other lawfully empowered individual authorized to perform or order a medical intervention.

2. Rights

a. Individuals possess a fundamental right to bodily autonomy.

b. Individuals must not be subjected to medical intervention without informed consent, except as permitted under Section 4.

c. Individuals have the right to refuse or withdraw consent to a medical intervention, unless doing so would cause imminent harm under emergency circumstances.

d. Individuals must be informed of their basic rights and provided reasonably accessible information necessary to make an informed decision.

e. Individuals must not be subjected to coercive or involuntary medical procedures.

f. Individuals must have access to a lawful avenue to challenge alleged violations of bodily autonomy or informed consent.

3. Obligations of Member Nations

Member nations shall:

a. Establish and maintain lawful procedures ensuring that medical interventions generally require informed consent.

b. Take reasonable measures to prevent coercive medical practices within their jurisdiction.

c. Ensure that responsible authorities provide individuals with information sufficient for informed consent, adapted to the medical context and the individual’s circumstances.

d. Maintain procedures for obtaining consent from guardians or lawful proxies for minors or incapacitated individuals.

e. Maintain lawful processes for emergency circumstances in which consent cannot be obtained.

f. Provide individuals with a means to challenge violations of the rights established in this resolution, through judicial, administrative, or other lawful mechanisms.

4. Exceptions

The requirements of informed consent do not apply when:

a. Emergency circumstances make obtaining consent impracticable and immediate intervention is necessary to prevent imminent harm.

b. A minor or incapacitated individual receives consent from a guardian or lawful proxy, consistent with member nation law.

c. Member nations undertake public health interventions that do not involve bodily intrusion.

d. Member nations perform non‑intrusive medical screenings necessary for public safety or health.

e. Member nations identify additional emergency categories, provided such categories are justified, lawful, and consistent with the principles of bodily autonomy.

5. Implementation

a. Member nations retain full authority over the administration, enforcement, and regulation of consent procedures within their jurisdiction.

b. Nothing in this resolution shall be construed to require the creation of any new World Assembly body or to empower any existing body to compel member nations to act or refrain from acting.

c. The World Assembly may interpret this resolution through future legislation, but enforcement remains the responsibility of member nations.

6. Final Provision

This resolution establishes foundational protections for bodily autonomy and informed consent while preserving the flexibility necessary for member nations to administer their own medical systems.

World Census Analysis
W I N N E R S
Civil RightsRecreational Drug UseIncome Equality
L O S E R S
Social ConservatismPolitical ApathyAuthoritarianism

World Census analysis assumes a typical nation. Individual results may vary.


This General Assembly resolution was authored by French New Wake Island and aims to prioritise the autonomy of patients and the role of consent with regard to medical procedures.

The United Regions Alliance recommends that you vote AGAINST this resolution

This resolution establishes various principles according to which the consent of patients to medical procedures must be prioritised. The resolution also clarifies how these principles are extended to minors, the incapable, and others not granted legal autonomy, and goes on to establish exemptions to these priorities. However, the URA, as well as the World Assembly Secretariat, has found that the resolution was likely authored by generative artificial intelligence, and that this would diminish the extensive research, labour, and energy General Assembly authors pour into their resolutions. Therefore, the URA urges a vote AGAINST this resolution.

Arguments from members of the URA included:

Battadia wrote:An interesting one. A lot of definitions and important clauses do allow member nations to add their own clauses. Moduland's Opinion (the only one out so far) does raise a problem in the form of this being AI-generated, which my own test backed up. While I generally believe that something is better than nothing in these early days of the GA, I think given the AI factor I am against this.

Lycos wrote:I believe there is another, better draft in progress by a different author.

Cywolf wrote:sad to see AI slop in the GA

Draganisia wrote:Not everything AI does is slop... but this one is. Against



Internal voting results

Turnout: 7/12 Members
Weighted turnout: 74.30%


This document was authored by Battadia on behalf of the United Regions Alliance. Please do not reproduce it without permission.
If you have been mentioned in this document and would like to avoid such an occurrence in future, please message here. URA Delegates, as tagged below, may not take advantage of this.
Read dispatch

Forum View

Advertisement