Governor: The Beautiful Empire of Orioni 2

WA Delegate (non-executive): The Beautiful Empire of Orioni 2 (elected )

Founder: The Homeworld of Planet Eurth

Last WA Update:

Maps Board Activity History Admin Rank

Most Nations: 140th Most World Assembly Endorsements: 378th
World Factbook Entry

🌍 Welcome · Bienvenue · Bem-vindo · 欢迎 · Wilkommen · Witamy · Bienvenido · Benvenuto · Добро пожаловать · Welkom · Välkommen · Mabuhay!

🔗 Links:

Link🏛️ Our Forum

Link⭐️ Featured roleplays

Link📰 News stories

Link🗺️ Map of Eurth

Link📖 IIWiki portal

Link💬 Discord server

Link🎙️ Eurth Deep Dive Podcast

🤝 NS Embassy (OOC)

🥳 22 Years of Eurth 🎂

✪ Established on January 9th 2004, the community of Eurth
is a colourful m⊙saic of diverse nations, based on the ideals of
freedom and democracy. We enjoy a realistic RP with Modern Tech,
and offer a welcoming community spirit. Good writing is appreciated,
and we are proud of our solid history and lore.

You are welcome to endorse the delegate. Please don't spam our RMB.

Proudly never featured in 22 years and counting! ∴ Join us!



  1. 2,963

    NationStates Guide

    MetaReference by Amerion . 122,668 reads.

  2. 5

    The Hitchhiker's Guide to Eurth

    MetaReference by Orioni 2 . 2,526 reads.

Embassies: Antargis, Alharu, Argis, Thalassa, Marenesia, Hyrule, belgium, Kylaris, Tiandi, Deutschland, URA, The League, NSToday, Coalition of Crown Albatross, Anteria, Sparkalia, and 4 others.Commonwealth of Liberty, Teremara, The Embassy, and Greater Dienstad.

Tags: Enormous, Human-Only, Independent, Map, Modern Tech, Offsite Chat, Offsite Forums, Past Tech, Role Player, Serious, Social, and Sports.

Regional Power: High

Eurth contains 262 nations, the 140th most in the world.

Today's World Census Report

The Highest Foreign Aid Spending in Eurth

The World Census intercepted food drops in several war-torn regions to determine which nations spent the most on international aid.

As a region, Eurth is ranked 11,460th in the world for Highest Foreign Aid Spending.

NationWA CategoryMotto
1.The Tchnosocial Myrmcocracy of The CathuntersLiberal Democratic Socialists“Playing NationStats with moo brains”
2.The Sanlorenzian Imaginativity of AplastalandIron Fist Consumerists“Improvement, environmentalism and chips!”
3.The Hopeful of Dominion of AcielonCorrupt Dictatorship“Fluff”
4.The Rogue Nation of GlurpLeft-wing Utopia“Twirling Toward Freedom”
5.The Delicious Creamosity of WachanaDemocratic Socialists“Procrastinate today!”
6.The United Democratic Republics of SongaiLiberal Democratic Socialists“Libertas est via”
7.The Greater Holy Empire of TagmatiumPsychotic Dictatorship“The Beacon of the Light of Christ”
8.The Beautiful Empire of Orioni 2Inoffensive Centrist Democracy“Libertati Viam Facere”
9.The Commonwealth of SokhanistanLiberal Democratic Socialists“Ayo”
10.The Irken Colony of AlienmarkyNew York Times Democracy“We Poke Badgers With Spoons”
1234. . .2627»

Regional Happenings

More...

Eurth Regional Message Board

Hello, Eurthican friends!

The URA recommends a non-binding vote FOR "World Assembly Governance Standards" by a vote of 37.29% FOR, 17.62% AGAINST, and 12.26% ABSTAIN.

The URA recommends a BINDING vote FOR "Commend Fooooooooo" by a vote of 55.74% FOR, 0.00% AGAINST, and 11.73% ABSTAIN.

Please see (and upvote!) our recommendations:


URA World Assembly Recommendation

World Assembly Governance Standards
Forum debate
The World Assembly,

Well aware of its newly-minted status of international body, serving tens of thousands of nations worldwide, and the responsibility that comes alongside dutiful oversight of these nations, and

Wishing to establish an early standard of respect within this institution, and between members, which preserves the autonomy of individual members of this body while still being capable of accomplishing policy goals of international significance, therefore

Enacts as follows:

  1. All binding actions taken by this Assembly ought to satisfy each of the following conditions:

    1. the subject matter presents a collective action problem that member nations cannot adequately address through independent domestic action, fundamental rights that transcend national sovereignty, or some other transboundary concern;

    2. the scope and intrusiveness of the resolution does not exceed what is reasonably necessary to address the identified concern; and

    3. among the available policy approaches capable of achieving the resolution's objective, the approach chosen is the least burdensome on the domestic governance of member nations, with respect to current understanding of how that is best accomplished.

  2. No binding action shall be taken by this body that impedes the sovereign right of members to determine their own constitutional order, or otherwise mandates or prohibits the adoption of any particular form of government, political system, or governing ideology. No resolution should govern a matter which is purely domestic in character and would violate clause 1 of this resolution.

  3. In all areas of policy which do not have explicit, active resolutions or clauses governing them, it is to be presumed that the World Assembly reserves governance of this issue to individual members, or independent coalitions of members, where applicable, for their policy assessment.

  4. Member nations are expected to extend good faith recognition of domestic policy choices of other members in areas which are not covered by the World Assembly or other relevant treaties, consistent with clause three of this resolution. This clause should not be construed to restrict member governments or officials from expressing political opinion regarding the domestic policies of other members.

Co-author: Heavens Reach

World Census Analysis
W I N N E R S
Patriotism
L O S E R S
Political Apathy
World Census analysis assumes a typical nation. Individual results may vary.

This General Assembly resolution was authored by Bisofeyri World Assembly Mission and aims to provide rules for future General Assembly legislation to follow.

The United Regions Alliance recommends that you vote FOR this resolution

This resolution requires that new General Assembly legislation only be written on matters where international cooperation is truly necessary, and requires that the World Assembly take action in the least obtrusive manner possible. It also makes clear that nations have sovereignty over all areas where the General Assembly has not explicitly legislated. Some URA members noted that certain clauses of the resolution were flawed, as detailed in the discussion below, but on the whole the URA finds that the aims achieved by this resolution outweigh the harms caused by its flaws, and thus urges a vote FOR this resolution.

Arguments from members of the URA included:

Battadia wrote:Toothless due to the contradiction rule being destroyed, and I feel like clause 1a could've been broken out into a sublist. Clause 3 is patently obvious, and clause 4 is just kind of weird. Still, I don't majorly object to it, weak support.

Agladnare wrote:"All binding actions taken by this Assembly ought to satisfy each of the following conditions: the subject matter presents... fundamental rights that transcend national sovereignty.

No binding action shall be taken by this body that impedes the sovereign right of members to determine their own... governing ideology."

This might be picky, but without a clear definition to "governing ideology", this two clause can contradict each other, no?

For example, the next resolution is Eliminating Slavery And Trafficking Of Persons. What if a member nation has a slaver ideology? The World Assembly can't interfere with their governing ideology, but at the same time can bind them to act against it? Since it's a matter of fundamental rights?

Zorgazia wrote:That clause is contradictory and a bit vague I'd say.



Internal voting results

Turnout: 6/12 Members
Weighted turnout: 67.17%


This document was authored by Battadia on behalf of the United Regions Alliance. Please do not reproduce it without permission.
If you have been mentioned in this document and would like to avoid such an occurrence in future, please message here. URA Delegates, as tagged below, may not take advantage of this.
Read dispatch



URA World Assembly Recommendation

Commend Fooooooooo
Forum debate
The Security Council,

Observing the utopian haven of Fooooooooo, resting in the quaint realm of Balder, and resolving to unearth the vital role the nation’s leader, Fuzzy the Owl, has played in developing the Balderan identity,

Starting with Fuzzy’s entry into Balderan politics in 2012, at that time a hotbed of conflicts due to the community’s nascent status, and their election into the Storting (the region’s parliament); they became one of the chief drivers of activity in the legislature through their equanimous engagements with their colleagues, soon assuming the post of Talman (Speaker) due to this demeanor,

Understanding that Fuzzy then went on to become one of the longest serving and most impactful Talmans in the region’s history; chief amidst their numerous achievements in the position is their orchestration of Balder’s peaceful transition to a monarchy in 2013, allowing the fledging Balderan community to breath a sigh of relief for the first time since its inception,

Uncovering Fuzzy’s adventures as one of Balder’s premier hosts of carnivals and jamborees, where the interregional community first came to interact with the Foooooooooan leader’s puntastic ways through events like Dragons of the Frozen Sea, a bilateral festival jointly hosted with The West Pacific (TWP) to celebrate the start of a new, enduring relationship between the two regions,

Noticing a pattern about Fuzzy’s admirable drive to improve the Balderan society, best exemplified through their work as the Minister of Integration of Balder; under their guidance, new integration and retention practices were implemented that resulted in the Delegate’s endorsement count soaring from just above 100 to almost 200, amplifying the region’s voice in the World Assembly,

Analyzing Fuzzy’s investiture into Balder’s esteemed nobility as the Crown Prince (Vice Delegate) to North East Somerset following the latter’s first coronation as King; apart from aiding in the strengthening of regional security (a task they dutifully continue to this day), they served as one of the primary impetuses behind constitutional reforms that separated the roles of head of state (King) and head of government (Statsminister), boosting the efficiency of the government and leading to the formation of the modern Balderan executive that has persevered into the modern era,

Recalling Fuzzy’s pioneering stint as the first Statsminister of Balder, where they set a high bar for all subsequent Statsministers through their exemplary work; they laid down the administrative foundations of the newly-created position which helped their successors ease into the role and would later return in the post in 2020 to restore stability into the region in the aftermath of Operation Heimdall, an internal plot to overthrow Balder’s sitting government,

Investigating Fuzzy’s momentary detour into the fabled land of Albion, which they helped to discover and spread the word of as one of its original settlers; it was thanks to their efforts that Albion ballooned to over 400 nations within a short period of time, allowing the community to flourish on an unprecedented level,

Reliving the magical culture Fuzzy helped curate during their stay in Albion, guided by the wisdom acquired from their early Balder days; Albion throughout its existence came to be known as a domain of unbridled whimsy, partly due to the dazzling fests Fuzzy helped organize like:

  • the Royal Festival, which celebrated the conclusion of the first-ever elections held in the realm,

  • the Falling Leaves Festival, which honored the coming of autumn in a multiverse-spanning revelry and saw over a thousand posts lodged onto the regional forums as a result, and,

  • the Solstice Celebration, a jointly-held gala with Europeia which commemorated the signing of the Treaty of Friendship between the two regions,

Returning to Balder, where Fuzzy proved themselves to be a consummate diplomat, devoted towards bettering the region’s transborder standing, by:

  • revitalizing relations with TWP, already a long-standing ally, which saw the two regions come closer than ever before,

  • supporting The East Pacific during Fedele’s failed coup, and negotiating the Treaty of Aarhus with the community immediately after, and,

  • thawing long-cold ties with The South Pacific by brokering the Pact of the Centre of the Earth, marking a shift in Balderan foreign policy by making peace with former defender rivals,

Rejoicing at Fuzzy’s ascension to the throne of Balder as King, the culmination of a decade of impeccable servitude towards the region; during their reign, Fuzzy spearheaded fundamental legislative reforms that incentivized citizen participation and led Balder to war against adherents of Raider Unity for their aggression against allies,

Believing that Fuzzy’s awe-inspiring dedication towards Balder and its interests deserves recognition from this august assembly,

Hereby commends Fooooooooo.

Co-authors: North East Somerset, Millenhaal

This Security Council resolution was authored by Emodea and aims to commend Fooooooooo.

The United Regions Alliance recommends that you vote FOR this resolution

This resolution seeks to commend Fooooooooo on the grounds of their extensive tenure in the government of Balder, and the multitude of accomplishments that their leadership has brought. The resolution goes on to applaud the efforts of Fooooooooo in Albion, and congratulate them on their ascension as King of Balder. The URA agrees that such extensive service should be recognised, and urges a vote FOR this resolution.

Arguments from members of the URA included:

Battadia wrote:An extensive list of accomplishments, seems well-deserved to me. Support.



Internal voting results

Turnout: 5/12 Members
Weighted turnout: 67.47%


This document was authored by Battadia on behalf of the United Regions Alliance. Please do not reproduce it without permission.
If you have been mentioned in this document and would like to avoid such an occurrence in future, please message here. URA Delegates, as tagged below, may not take advantage of this.
Read dispatch

Yo, what's up? I'm new to this whole 'run the country that daddy left me' thing, so any help? []

Good morning Merdan. Now that you've joined Eurth, here's a primer to help you get started.


★ The Hitchhiker's Guide to Eurth

WelcomeGetting startedAbout NationStatesHistoryFeedback

TL;DR:
  • A solid, active and dedicated community

  • Creative efforts going into writing an design

  • Excellent world map that can compete with the best

  • A humble history stretching back to 2004


1 Welcome to Eurth

Emblem:

Motto:

United in Diversity

Demonym:

Eurthican

Establishment:
• Foundation
• Independence

9 January 2004
2 April 2019

Forum:

Linkeurth.org

Discord:

LinkDiscord

IIWiki:

LinkEurth

Map:

LinkSee atlas

You step off the plane, and a fresh breeze hits you in the face. Greetings esteemed leader of your glorious and well-respected nation! A driver is waiting to take you to your embassy. But first...

If you haven't already heard this from the Delegate, other leaders on the RMB, or elsewhere: Welcome to Eurth!

This pristine region was established in January 2004, relatively short after the creation of NationStates. That makes us one of those rare ancient regions. Originally, the region is named after the real-world continent of Europa (Linksee Wikipedia). In April 2019 an April Fools' Day joke by one person nudged us to move to this secondary location of Eurth.

As a community, we are committed to freedom and personal choice. Here is the place to be part of this venture, Project Eurth. In many ways, the people who come to Eurth hold those values dear. Even thought we're spread across the globe, everyone knows one another for so many years now this has become a "third place"

Now that you have arrived in Eurth, let met outline some of the best reason to stay.

  1. We are an open and accepting community. A diversity of political views are welcomed here, as long as such views are in accordance with NationStates' rules.

  2. We are one of the oldest regions in NationStates. This region has seen many nation rise and fall while creating a lasting legacy. Stay and become part of a legacy that stretches back all the way to the foundation of NationStates!

  3. Eurth remains neutral. While other regions gladly join the interregional cat-and-mouse game of crashing and defending, we prefer to build a lasting legacy. Our peace and neutrality are guarded and guaranteed by our founder Planet Eurth.

Since you're reading this, we'll assume you are convinced to stay in Eurth. To prevent your inbox from overflowing you can turn off recruitment telegrams in the future, just go to this page and disable recruitment telegrams settings.


2 Getting started in Eurth


Satellite image of our planet, Earth / Eurth / Alemi, taken by EOSSAT in 2017.
2.1 Join the Community

The LinkRegional Forum of Eurth is where most of our business is conducted. To gain access to it and get involved you will need to apply for membership. To do so, you will have to Linkregister for Membership. After you have submitted your application, you may want to Linkstart a new thread to introduce yourself.

The Linkregional Discord is another area for all of us to chat, meet up, share jokes, and whatnot. We usually have at least a handful of member online, up to circa 50 members in total, and it is a good way to make friends in Eurth. The Discord is also used to spread news, important content, and information to the general public fastest, so it is a great way to stay informed of what is going on at all times. Link to Discord: LinkClick Here!

2.2 Crafting your nation
Once you have figured your way around the Forum, you should create some standard RP topics to help shape your nation. We recommend that you start by publishing both a Linknational factbook and a Linknews agency. Look to others for inspiration.

Once you are active in our regional roleplay, you will qualify for Linka place on the Map of Eurth. The most effective way of having your application approved is by following the simple rules as explained in the applications topic. The questions will help is decide where you would most enjoy establishing your nation.

2.3 Create your role-play story
In a game revolving around nations, the more realistic your nation the more fun you will have. LinkLook at the factbooks of other nations. You can also look at the Wikipedia articles of Real Life nations to get yourself started. Once you have something put together you may want to post it for everyone to see. Another good starting point is Linkcreating a news agency that publishes recent happenings in your nation. Unsure how to write a news article? Follow this guide on how to write an RP news post. Should the unfortunate event arrive of conflict and warfare, here are some articles for your consideration.

2.4 Join the NationStates World Assembly and endorse the World Assembly Delegate

Go to the World Assembly page and join the World Assembly (WA). The WA is an international organisation, similar to real life international organisations, that passes international laws, restrictions, and other legislation. Being a part of the WA will help you get involved in the international community and significantly improve your NationStates experience. To join the WA, simply click the "Apply to Join" button at the top of the page, and check your email for an approval letter. After you have joined the WA, remember to go to the WA Delegate's nation page, and give them your endorsement. Your endorsement will give the Delegate more votes in the WA, and therefore help Eurth be more influential in the World Assembly when voting on resolutions in the General Assembly and Security Council. This also allows you to vote in the WA on all resolutions as well as propose resolutions to the WA.

2.5 Foreign relations
Embassy requests should always be preceded by a telegram or RMB message. Random offers to exchange embassies without any context or explanation will be ignored.

Regional travellers are extremely welcome. In the past we've had some wonderful experiences with this concept. You don't have to believe me. Just read the interviews with Chatalhoyuk, A Flying Turtle, or Migrating Geese. In 2020 Eurth was rated as a "favorite region".


3 More about NationStates

Whether you are a new nation or oldtimer, there is a lot to do for everyone. To cater to those many different tastes, we have a collected a series of tutorials to help you out.

3.1 For beginning players

3.2 For intermediate player

3.3 For advanced players

How the game works, and the voting on issues.

A deeper look at factbooks. War in the form of raiding and defending.

All about calculators and how the World Assembly works.


4 History of Eurth

4.1 Genesis (early 2004)
Early days for Europa. The first light appeared on January 9th, 2004. The Europa Empire decided to (re)found Europa in his own image. And he saw that it was good. Every year we celebrate this period with some nice regional festivities. Many other first creations happened in this period. Four months later Linkthe regional forum was created. Back then the RMB didn't hold more than 10 posts, so everyone was happy to have a dedicated place to continue their conversations. Everything older would get erased. Since we had a lot to say to each other, an off-site forum was established quite quickly. It evolved throughout the years but all of the history is still preserved. Some other people prefer to use the NS forums. But they probably haven't experienced the Jolt forums (2006-2010), creation of NationStates 2, and the subsequent implosion and erasure of old stories. 🤞 We've never had that happen.

4.2 Golden Age (mid 2004 to 2008)
We experienced a first golden age between 2004-2008. A regional government was formed, organised around our LinkCitizen Plaza. A place for everyone to spill their guts regarding the policy of the government, for open discussions and comments. Seasonal elections were held for the Senator. There were also 3 ministries: internal affairs, foreign affairs, and defence (TEA: The Europa Army).

International relations were established across the Nationverse. Built along the Hermes Avenue are the embassies of our strong allies, and the consulates of our honourable friends. This proved Linkthe best place to talk to foreigners, just as long as you don't feed them. Our old friend Thel D'Ran of Lemuria even included us Linkin his regional rankings.

This period of high activity led to a natural influx of new members, pushing us towards 300 players. These were good times. Much of this OOC and IC history Linkis preserved in our archived blog The Europan Times.

4.3 Middle Ages (2009 to 2014)
Every Golden Age like that is usually followed by a less spectacular silver age. In Europa, this period is described by some as the "Great Lull". While our activity did not completely come to a standstill, it did slow down when compared to the previous period. The influx of new nations was less than before. This period also corresponds with the steep rise of social media sites such as Facebook and Twitter. Perhaps that's where everyone spent their days? And don't forget about real-life, the harsh mistress that stole away many a writer from our midsts.

4.4 Renaissance (2015 to April 2019)
A new spark triggered the light for our Renaissance period. An actual LinkProject Renaissance led us down a five-year path of rejuvenation. This saw both the arrival of new creative spirits as well as the return of many classic colleagues. We cleaned up our act, replaced IRC with Discord (May 3rd, 2017), merged with UBPSSIF (May 30th, 2017), upgraded our forums (September 23rd, 2017), established a Wiki (January 2018) and stepped up our roleplay game. These years showed to be an excellent time for our growing community.

We're always busy with community activities (NOTM), story polls and organising games (ex. EurthCraft). Most visitors are pleasantly surprised this community has been going for so long. The second most heard comment is about the stories and maps we make for our RP. We have quite a number of writers, designers and even developers among us who regularly blow us away with the quality of their creations.

After this internal freshening-up, we restarted our external outreach by making ourselves more visible to the wider NS audience. A public embassy was opened for NS GP. Helpful answers on Reddit NS attracted some lovely people. We opened Linka regional booth during the NationState World Fair 6 and participated in an interregional football tournament hosted by The League of Conservative Nations where our 'Valiant Vertibirds' went down fighting. When there's a NS game going on (e.g. zombies or nukes) we also join in on the fun and it can become quite competitive. Our world became a much bigger, well-rounded place.

4.5 Reformation (April 2019 to mid-2026)
In 2019 a belated April Fools' Day joke by one person nudged us towards an unscheduled move from Europa to Eurth. Someone drank too much of the Kool-Aid and decided it'd be a fun idea to go and change the locks on all the doors. What a way to go... Naturally, because it was still April and cold outside, we had to look elsewhere for shelter. Everyone helped out carrying boxes to our new place at Eurth.

Together with the new living space, we also introduced the concept of an RP Academy, together with volunteer mentors to guide newcomers. This serves two roles: guiding new players around the vast lore and particular rules, while also creating a threshold for low-effort ghosts. The community began holding regular events, story polls and welcomed many visitors. Recruitment telegram were restarted by Tagmatium which had a positive effect. As a result, the community membership creeped back up to the low 300s, similar to what it was during the Golden Age.

4.6 Industrial revolution (mid-2026 to present)
An announcement by the forum host prompted the staff to spring into action, and make a decision on the future of the off-site forum. Something is coming. Soon.


5 Feedback

If you have more questions or want to share feedback, feel free to telegram our delegate Orioni 2. You can also post on the regional message board (RMB), post your questions on the forum, or stop by our chat room. We look forward to hearing from you and helping out with any of your requests.

Read dispatch

Hello, Eurthican friends!

The URA recommends a BINDING vote FOR "Eliminating Slavery and Trafficking of Persons" by a vote of 55.68% FOR, 0% AGAINST, and 0% ABSTAIN.

Please see (and upvote!) our recommendation:


URA World Assembly Recommendation

Eliminating Slavery and Trafficking of Persons
Forum debate
The World Assembly,

Seeing that slavery and the trade of sapient beings is a significant threat to the well-being of individuals, communities, and worlds throughout the multiverse,

Recognizing that noble efforts were undertaken in outlawing these barbaric practices since nearly the beginning of the historic General Assembly,

Now hoping to follow in those footsteps and ban such practices once more in a concise and straightforward manner,

Definitions:

  1. “Slavery” is a state of servitude in which a natural person or other entity exercises the powers of ownership over another person;

  2. “Forced labour” is a system of labour which is forced upon a natural person under threat of harm or penalty and against the will of the labourer, excluding the following cases:

    1. National service applying to a large fraction of the national population, using conscription based on objective factors, and limited in period to at most half of an individual's life expectancy;

    2. Dire and particular circumstances, where not working significantly risks danger to others;

    3. If the labourer agrees with informed and prior consent to labour for a fixed and finite term or quantity;

  3. “Trafficking” as the sale or transfer of persons for the purpose of forced or slave labour, or the facilitation of such a transfer;

Mandates:

  1. Slavery, trafficking, and forced labour are prohibited in all member states;

  2. Ownership of any person is not legally recognized in member states;

  3. Member nations shall facilitate the consensual repatriation of trafficked persons to other member nations;

  4. The World Assembly is to impose comprehensive sanctions against states recognizing legal slavery and trafficking.

Co-author: Picairn

World Census Analysis
W I N N E R S
EqualityCompassionNiceness
L O S E R S
Economic FreedomEmploymentRudeness
P O L I C I E S   C A N C E L L E D
Slavery No Emigration

World Census analysis assumes a typical nation. Individual results may vary.


This General Assembly resolution was authored by Islandwalk and aims to prohibit slavery and the trafficking of persons in member states.

The United Regions Alliance recommends that you vote FOR this resolution

This resolution absolutely prohibits slavery, the trafficking of persons, and forced labour within World Assembly member states, as per the definitions of those terms. It also requires the repatriation of trafficked persons discovered within member states, and the sanctioning of nations which participate in slavery and the trafficking of persons. Some URA members noted various weak points in the resolutions and areas where, in their opinion, it should be strengthened, but on the whole the URA finds that the aims achieved by this resolution outweigh the harms caused by its flaws, and thus urges a vote FOR this resolution.

Arguments from members of the URA included:

Battadia wrote:I for one think slavery is bad. Although, I don't much like clause 2c, I would prefer a "limited in period to at most half of an individual's life expectancy" or similar limitation like in clause 2a. Additionally, consent in clause 2c should be required to be freely given, as well. Furthermore, I don't really like mandate 3 as it allows nations to force consent and then ship out trafficked persons to some third country. Should be, at minimum, the same consent requirements as in (my ideal) clause 2c of free, prior, and informed consent.
Still, something is better than nothing, support.



Internal voting results


This document was authored by Battadia on behalf of the United Regions Alliance. Please do not reproduce it without permission.
If you have been mentioned in this document and would like to avoid such an occurrence in future, please message here. URA Delegates, as tagged below, may not take advantage of this.
Read dispatch

hey chat I'm back

Hello, Eurthican friends!

The URA recommends a BINDING vote FOR "World Environmental Treaty" by a vote of 72.67% FOR, 0% AGAINST, and 0% ABSTAIN.

Please see (and upvote!) our recommendation:


URA World Assembly Recommendation

World Environmental Treaty
Forum debate
The World Assembly,

Recognizing that issues of transboundary nature, of which environmental degradation is among the most consequential, are a salient concern for this Body to address, as no member state alone can fully address damages arising therefrom, and

Convinced that the long-term sustainability of shared ecosystems and the pursuit of economic development are inalienable rights of this Assembly’s members best considered as complementary, not competing, objectives to be navigated according to each member’s individual circumstances and capabilities, and

Noting that, following the annihilation of the body previously occupying this space, no extant WA entity serves to coordinate endeavors of environmental concern nor facilitate the international exchange of environmental information, hereby enacts as follows:

  1. The World Assembly establishes the following guiding principles, in the hope that they will be respected and upheld by all members:

    1. Pursuant to international law, each member has the right to exploit the resources within their jurisdiction and the responsibility to ensure that such exploitation does not cause undue environmental harm to the jurisdiction of other members without their consent;

    2. Where there is a risk for significant or long-term environmental damage from state action or inaction, uncertainty of the possibility of such damage should not preclude reasonable efforts to prevent environmental damage;

    3. In cases where a member causes undue or preventable transboundary environmental harm to a neighboring member’s jurisdiction, the member responsible is also responsible for the cost of the infringement, accounting for feasibility, public interest, international trade, and other circumstantial considerations;

    4. When undertaking environmental initiatives, members ought to endeavor to equitably consider the needs of the current generation and future generations;

    5. Due to the varying circumstances, needs, and capabilities of members, each individual member has different and corresponding responsibilities to prevent and mitigate global environmental degradation;

    6. Individuals in members are entitled to be made aware of environmental proceedings which may reasonably affect them, including but not limited to health, safety, and quality of life risks from environmental degradation of any scale;

    7. Member-driven exploitation of the environment ought to be undertaken in a manner that maintains the long-term ecological viability of its components and does not cause significant degradation to adjacent, dependent, or intertwined ecosystems; and

    8. Members and their people ought to work together in good faith on environmental initiatives, especially where transboundary implications are entailed.

  2. The Environmental Coordination Office (ECO) is hereby founded to aid members in their pursuit of environmental endeavors and response to environmental events. ECO shall be bound by the following duties and obligations, but shall not have the ability to compel a member into action or inaction unless further empowered by future resolutions:

    1. Regularly monitor global environmental markers, including but not limited to greenhouse gas emissions, ambient air quality, freshwater availability, and global biodiversity, and shall provide these measurements free of charge to all member governments;

    2. Coordinate with member governments on national and subnational environmental monitoring endeavors, striving to standardize environmental data measurement and reporting guidelines;

    3. Provide reasonable technical and logistical assistance to member governments suffering environmental damages or working on environmental projects upon request;

    4. Facilitate the exchange of pertinent information between members who may otherwise have difficulty exchanging such information, for example due to diplomatic tensions;

  3. Upon becoming aware of an event within their jurisdiction that poses a credible risk of significant transboundary environmental harm, such as the large-scale release of pollutants, acute ecosystem collapse, or hazardous contamination of waterways or airsheds, members will notify ECO and any other potentially affected parties under World Assembly jurisdiction as soon as possible.

  4. Any body established by future World Assembly legislation to address environmental matters should, unless that legislation specifies otherwise, either operate as a subsidiary body under ECO's administrative coordination or maintain a formally coordinated relationship with ECO, and shall work to ensure coherence among World Assembly environmental policy and the principles established herein.

Co-author: The Ankhalic Vaspriot

World Census Analysis
W I N N E R S
TourismForeign AidEnvironmental Beauty
L O S E R S
Political ApathyEconomic FreedomIndustry: Pizza Delivery

World Census analysis assumes a typical nation. Individual results may vary.


This General Assembly resolution was authored by Bisofeyri World Assembly Mission and aims to protect the environment of member states from harm.

The United Regions Alliance recommends that you vote FOR this resolution

This resolution establishes principles regarding how member states should work to prevent major economic damage, the spread of environmental harm across borders, and several other matters. It also requires that member state citizens be informed of environmental degradation which could affect them. Additionally, the resolution establishes the Environmental Coordination Office to host and coordinate future World Assembly legislation on environmental matters, and mandates that the Environmental Coordination Office collect, provide, and coordinate environmental data. The URA supports these aims and methods, and thus urges a vote FOR this resolution.

Arguments from members of the URA included:

Battadia wrote:Very intfed, support.

Lycos wrote:Actually not very intfed, the scale and topic are perfectly appropriate for an international body. Support.

Tomington wrote:I do very much like the establishment of the ECO as a monitoring organization. I think it's a nice touch and could very readily be used for future resolutions



Internal voting results

Turnout: 6/12 Members
Weighted turnout: 72.67%


This document was authored by Battadia on behalf of the United Regions Alliance. Please do not reproduce it without permission.
If you have been mentioned in this document and would like to avoid such an occurrence in future, please message here. URA Delegates, as tagged below, may not take advantage of this.
Read dispatch

Hello, Eurthican friends!

The URA recommends a non-binding vote FOR "International War Crimes Convention" by a vote of 39.03% FOR, 27.06% AGAINST, and 0% ABSTAIN.

Please see (and upvote!) our recommendation:


URA World Assembly Recommendation

International War Crimes Convention
Forum debate
The General Assembly,

RECOGNIZING that armed conflict causes immense and unnecessary suffering among civilians;

AFFIRMING that humane conduct in warfare and the protection of civilians are vital principles of international law;

ACKNOWLEDGING that serious violations of moral and humanitarian norms during armed conflict should be recognized as war crimes;

SEEKING to establish standards for the protection of civilians, protected persons, medical operations, and evidence relating to such crimes;

Hereby establishes the following standards regarding war crimes and the conduct of warfare:

  1. Defines “civilian” as any individual who is not a member of armed forces or otherwise directly participating in hostilities;

  2. Civilians are not legitimate military targets unless directly participating in hostilities, and combatants must distinguish between civilians and military objectives while taking reasonable precautions to minimize civilian harm when engaging lawful military targets;

  3. Actions intended to terrorize civilian populations are prohibited, including attacks, threats, demonstrations of violence, or military operations intended to spread fear, intimidation, or severe physical harm among civilians;

  4. Defines “civilian infrastructure” as facilities primarily supporting civilian life, including housing, humanitarian shelters, medical facilities, water, electrical, food, and sanitation systems;

  5. Targeting civilian infrastructure is prohibited unless it directly and substantially contributes to military operations and its destruction, capture, or neutralization would provide a definite military advantage;

  6. Medical facilities retain special protection unless used for hostile military-related purposes beyond their humanitarian function;

  7. The deliberate use of civilians, the wounded and sick, or protected civilian infrastructure to shield military objectives from attack is prohibited, including placing military forces or material among them for that purpose;

  8. The starvation of civilian populations as a method of warfare is prohibited, including deliberate deprivation or destruction of resources vital for civilian survival and wellbeing;

  9. Individuals captured or detained during armed conflict must be treated humanely, including:

    1. protection from torture, cruel treatment, or degrading treatment;

    2. access to food, water, shelter, and medical care sufficient to preserve basic health and survival, to the greatest extent reasonably practicable and without adverse distinction;

    3. protection from execution or punishment solely on the basis of nationality, civilian status, or lawful service in an opposing armed force, except following lawful judicial process and conviction for a specific criminal offense;

    4. protection from being taken or held as hostages;

  10. Military officials, civilian authorities, or other persons exercising effective authority over combatants or military operations shall be held responsible for war crimes committed by subordinates where they knew, or reasonably should have known, that such crimes were being committed or likely to be committed, and failed to take reasonable measures within their authority to prevent, stop, report, or punish such acts;

  11. The wounded and sick, meaning individuals rendered incapable of fighting by wounds or sickness, whether military or civilian, must not be attacked, denied protection, or deprived of adequate medical care except by legitimate medical priority;

  12. Medical personnel, medical transport, and exclusively humanitarian medical operations must not be targeted or obstructed unless used beyond their humanitarian function for hostile military-related purposes;

  13. Member states shall take reasonable and feasible measures to preserve evidence in their possession or control relating to credible allegations of war crimes, including documentation of civilian harm, preservation of relevant battlefield evidence, and cooperation with investigations;

  14. Establishes the World Assembly War Crimes Documentation Commission, tasked with collecting and maintaining records of alleged war crimes reported by member states, assisting with documentation and evidence preservation, and publishing periodic reports summarizing international news and trends relating to violations of this Convention.

World Census Analysis
W I N N E R S
Civil RightsWelfareCompassion
L O S E R S
Social ConservatismPolitical ApathyAuthoritarianism

World Census analysis assumes a typical nation. Individual results may vary.


This General Assembly resolution was authored by The Orwell Society and aims to establish basic definitions and prohibitions within the context of war crimes.

The United Regions Alliance recommends that you vote FOR this resolution

This resolution establishes various prohibitions on military activity, including attacks on civilians, civilian infrastructure, medical facilities, and the wounded and sick. It also prohibits the use of starvation in a military context, as well as the mistreatment of prisoners of war and the use of terrorism against civilians. Furthermore, the resolution establishes the World Assembly War Crimes Documentation Commission, and requires that all member states protect any evidence obtained that indicates the occurrence of war crimes. The URA supports these aims and methods, and thus urges a vote FOR this resolution.

Arguments from members of the URA included:

Battadia wrote:It's a bit spotty, but something is better than nothing. Support.

Agladnare wrote:"Targeting civilian infrastructure is prohibited unless it directly and substantially contributes to military operations and its destruction, capture, or neutralization would provide a definite military advantage."

Against due to the clause above.



Internal voting results

Turnout: 6/12 Members
Weighted turnout: 66.09%


This document was authored by Battadia on behalf of the United Regions Alliance. Please do not reproduce it without permission.
If you have been mentioned in this document and would like to avoid such an occurrence in future, please message here. URA Delegates, as tagged below, may not take advantage of this.
Read dispatch

Hello, Eurthican friends!

The URA recommends a BINDING vote AGAINST "Bodily Autonomy and Informed Consent" by a vote of 4.28% FOR, 62.97% AGAINST, and 7.05% ABSTAIN.

Please see (and upvote!) our recommendation:


URA World Assembly Recommendation

Bodily Autonomy and Informed Consent
Forum debate
Bodily Autonomy and Informed Consent

The General Assembly,

Recognizing that individuals retain inherent rights over their own bodies and personal autonomy,

Affirming that informed consent is a fundamental component of ethical medical practice and the protection of human dignity,

Concerned that the absence of clear international standards may enable coercive, harmful, or non‑consensual medical practices,

Determined to establish foundational protections while preserving the ability of member nations to administer their own medical systems,

Hereby enacts the following:

1. Definitions

For the purposes of this resolution:

a. “Medical intervention” means any procedure, treatment, examination, or action that directly affects an individual’s bodily integrity.

b. “Informed consent” means voluntary, revocable agreement to a medical intervention, given after the individual has been provided reasonably accessible information about the nature, purpose, risks, benefits, and alternatives of the intervention.

c. “Coercion” means any threat, penalty, manipulation, or undue pressure that would reasonably compromise an individual's ability to freely consent.

d. “Emergency circumstances” means situations in which delaying medical intervention would pose an imminent threat to an individual’s life or risk severe and immediate harm.

e. “Incapacitated individual” means any person who, due to age, unconsciousness, cognitive impairment, or other condition recognized by the member nation, cannot meaningfully provide informed consent.

f. “Responsible authority” means any medical professional or other lawfully empowered individual authorized to perform or order a medical intervention.

2. Rights

a. Individuals possess a fundamental right to bodily autonomy.

b. Individuals must not be subjected to medical intervention without informed consent, except as permitted under Section 4.

c. Individuals have the right to refuse or withdraw consent to a medical intervention, unless doing so would cause imminent harm under emergency circumstances.

d. Individuals must be informed of their basic rights and provided reasonably accessible information necessary to make an informed decision.

e. Individuals must not be subjected to coercive or involuntary medical procedures.

f. Individuals must have access to a lawful avenue to challenge alleged violations of bodily autonomy or informed consent.

3. Obligations of Member Nations

Member nations shall:

a. Establish and maintain lawful procedures ensuring that medical interventions generally require informed consent.

b. Take reasonable measures to prevent coercive medical practices within their jurisdiction.

c. Ensure that responsible authorities provide individuals with information sufficient for informed consent, adapted to the medical context and the individual’s circumstances.

d. Maintain procedures for obtaining consent from guardians or lawful proxies for minors or incapacitated individuals.

e. Maintain lawful processes for emergency circumstances in which consent cannot be obtained.

f. Provide individuals with a means to challenge violations of the rights established in this resolution, through judicial, administrative, or other lawful mechanisms.

4. Exceptions

The requirements of informed consent do not apply when:

a. Emergency circumstances make obtaining consent impracticable and immediate intervention is necessary to prevent imminent harm.

b. A minor or incapacitated individual receives consent from a guardian or lawful proxy, consistent with member nation law.

c. Member nations undertake public health interventions that do not involve bodily intrusion.

d. Member nations perform non‑intrusive medical screenings necessary for public safety or health.

e. Member nations identify additional emergency categories, provided such categories are justified, lawful, and consistent with the principles of bodily autonomy.

5. Implementation

a. Member nations retain full authority over the administration, enforcement, and regulation of consent procedures within their jurisdiction.

b. Nothing in this resolution shall be construed to require the creation of any new World Assembly body or to empower any existing body to compel member nations to act or refrain from acting.

c. The World Assembly may interpret this resolution through future legislation, but enforcement remains the responsibility of member nations.

6. Final Provision

This resolution establishes foundational protections for bodily autonomy and informed consent while preserving the flexibility necessary for member nations to administer their own medical systems.

World Census Analysis
W I N N E R S
Civil RightsRecreational Drug UseIncome Equality
L O S E R S
Social ConservatismPolitical ApathyAuthoritarianism

World Census analysis assumes a typical nation. Individual results may vary.


This General Assembly resolution was authored by French New Wake Island and aims to prioritise the autonomy of patients and the role of consent with regard to medical procedures.

The United Regions Alliance recommends that you vote AGAINST this resolution

This resolution establishes various principles according to which the consent of patients to medical procedures must be prioritised. The resolution also clarifies how these principles are extended to minors, the incapable, and others not granted legal autonomy, and goes on to establish exemptions to these priorities. However, the URA, as well as the World Assembly Secretariat, has found that the resolution was likely authored by generative artificial intelligence, and that this would diminish the extensive research, labour, and energy General Assembly authors pour into their resolutions. Therefore, the URA urges a vote AGAINST this resolution.

Arguments from members of the URA included:

Battadia wrote:An interesting one. A lot of definitions and important clauses do allow member nations to add their own clauses. Moduland's Opinion (the only one out so far) does raise a problem in the form of this being AI-generated, which my own test backed up. While I generally believe that something is better than nothing in these early days of the GA, I think given the AI factor I am against this.

Lycos wrote:I believe there is another, better draft in progress by a different author.

Cywolf wrote:sad to see AI slop in the GA

Draganisia wrote:Not everything AI does is slop... but this one is. Against



Internal voting results

Turnout: 7/12 Members
Weighted turnout: 74.30%


This document was authored by Battadia on behalf of the United Regions Alliance. Please do not reproduce it without permission.
If you have been mentioned in this document and would like to avoid such an occurrence in future, please message here. URA Delegates, as tagged below, may not take advantage of this.
Read dispatch

Hello, Eurthican friends!

The URA recommends a BINDING vote FOR "The World Cup" by a vote of 73.99% FOR, 0% AGAINST, and 0% ABSTAIN.

Please see (and upvote!) our recommendation:


URA World Assembly Recommendation

The World Cup
Forum debate
The Security Council,

Recognizing that in a multiverse with intense competition, fandom, hooliganism, rivalries and conflict, the need for a grandiose international association football competition has been present since the dawn of time to suffice such natural sapient desires,

Cognizant that across 101 tournaments thus far, since the dawn of antiquity, the World Cup has established itself as the world's premier sporting competition, consistently drawing the most attention and participation out of any international sporting event,

Celebrating the humble beginnings of this famed international tournament we hold as granted today, as the first World Cup was organized and held in the nation of Ariddia, and, in its most primitive form, was won by Crosshill, as no qualifying system was added to the tournament yet and matches were more randomized and less ordered,

Acknowledging the numerous innovations to the World Cup since its inception, that have paved the way for similar international competitions to take place, such as the introduction of the KPB Ranking system since World Cup 12 (since replaced by KPB+), which calculates the strength of nations based on numerous factors, and the development of multiple “scorinators” to officiate World Cup results based on merit, although nations continue to blame Goddess Margaret for peculiar results,

Recollecting the most famous dynasties throughout the World Cup, teams whose sheer dominance has only been matched by their tactical genius:

  • Rejistania, a side that innovated a novel defensive style, referred to as System Karela, that, through sheer determination and defensive prowess, led them to win World Cups 12, 17, 18, and 23, most notably winning in a comeback 4-3 against Kaze Progressa to secure their third title, where player Jenji Y came on as a substitute to score a winning 20 yard volley,

  • Aguazul, a team that came to prominence through the first and only three-peat of World Cup titles, winning World Cup 54, and then World Cups 57-59 consecutively, propelled by their star striker, Sosimo Lisson, whose vital goalscoring and penalty heroics, combined with the team’s lack of losing habits and defensive expertise, would earn the striker a namesake metric,

  • Banija, a nation whose rise to prominence was capped off by their win in World Cup 86, after finishing 3rd in two of the previous three years, winning 3-2 over Nephara, before winning back to back titles in World Cup in World Cups 93 and 94, driven by prolific striker Abel Wesoloski-Okafor, who scored 2 goals in each final to propel them to victory,

Commemorating nations not mentioned but whose successes are just as impressive, and whose consistency has propelled them to become some of the greatest footballing nations in the multiverse, including record 5-time winners Valanora, Starblaydia, (nations that together formed the dominant period Two Now Stand), Alasdair I Frosticus (The Holy Empire), as well as 4-time winners Audioslavia and Bedistan, along with Schottia’s World Cup 78-80 run, which was the most statistically dominant in history, although notably no nation has managed to accrue 6 wins so far,

Remembering the most famous, or otherwise infamous games and moments in the World Cup’s decorated past, moments and that will surely go down in history as defining players, managers, and nations legacies, and well beyond:

  • A Miracle on Cockbill Street, where, in the World Cup 21 Quarterfinals, Bedistan defeated Vilita 8-7, as both teams lined up in a 0-5-5 formation, and then preceded to absolutely pummel each other with no regard for defensive playing, only settled after Alejandro Vantrease scored in the 88th minute to win Bedistan the match,

  • The Asterisk, where, in World Cup 56 qualifying, Bears Armed is recorded as having beat Peisandros 14-0, as apparently a drunk Starblaydi referee had double-vision for the game and thus counted twice as many goals as actually occurred, although the record books maintain a score of 14-0 against the ursines wishes,

Appreciating all those who make the seemingly implausible success of this tournament possible; the footballing federations, the players, World Cup Committee organizers and the host nations, the fans, the undue nations not possible to recognize in such a short space, and everyone else involved in this spectacular competition, as well as the Baptism of Fire and the Cup of Harmony, tournaments which fill out a complete World Cup cycle,

Believing that whether ending up successful champions or disappointed losers, the World Cup has always proven to inspire hopeful competitors, diehard fans, and entire nations and populaces, hoping to forever enshrine their name in history,

Hereby declares the World Cup to be eternally enshrined in the history books of this esteemed council.

This Security Council resolution was authored by Fachumonn and aims to recognise the World Cup and its significance on the international stage.

The United Regions Alliance recommends that you vote FOR this resolution

This resolution recognises the significant place the World Cup has had on the multiversal community, and seeks to enshrine this tournament in the annals of the Security Council. The resolution explicitly notes various events and teams in World Cup history, including applauding nations with particularly distinctive tournament placings, current record accomplishments, and also particularly notable or amusing matches in World Cup history. The URA agrees that an event which spreads such joy across nations should be recognised, and urges a vote FOR this resolution.

Arguments from members of the URA included:

Battadia wrote:NS Sports? Support!

Orioni 2 wrote:LinkHaving just won the World Cup, this is a yes for me as well.



Internal voting results

Turnout: 6/12 Members
Weighted turnout: 73.99%


This document was authored by Battadia on behalf of the United Regions Alliance. Please do not reproduce it without permission.
If you have been mentioned in this document and would like to avoid such an occurrence in future, please message here. URA Delegates, as tagged below, may not take advantage of this.
Read dispatch

Hello, Eurthican friends!

The URA recommends a non-binding vote AGAINST "Reserved Powers" by a vote of 16.21% FOR, 49.12% AGAINST, and 12.69% ABSTAIN.

Please see (and upvote!) our recommendation:


URA World Assembly Recommendation

Reserved Powers
Forum debate
Reserved Powers

The World Assembly,

Affirming that member nations are sovereign political communities and not constituent subdivisions of an international federation;

Holding that such political communities ultimately derive their legitimacy from the societies that they represent, and therefore remain the primary institutions through which societies govern their own affairs;

Observing that the wide variety of political, social, and economic systems present throughout the international community renders centralized regulation both necessarily inefficient and generalizing to a dangerous extent;

Acknowledging that nevertheless, certain matters require international cooperation, whether due to their transboundary nature or their relation to fundamental rights;

Cognizant that efforts to address such matters carry the risk of displacing sovereign governance from its core competencies and, in doing so, can undermine the legitimacy of this body;

Seeking to establish a durable framework governing the relationship between the Assembly and its members;

Hereby:

  1. Establishes that sovereign authority is presumed to reside in member nations except where expressly modified by legislation enacted by this Assembly;

  2. Recognizes the following areas of governance as core sovereign competencies ordinarily reserved to member nations:

    1. Territorial governance, including the administration of territory and the populations subject to national authority;

    2. Domestic lawmaking, judicial administration, and the enforcement of the law;

    3. Foreign relations, including all facets of diplomacy, participation in international organizations, and commerce;

    4. National defense and the protection of populations from external threats;

    5. Economic governance, including taxation, fiscal and monetary policy, public expenditure, and currency issuance;

    6. Border control, immigration policy, and employment within national territory;

    7. The management, conservation, and exploitation of resources within national jurisdiction;

    8. Cultural, linguistic, educational, and civic policy;

  3. Recognizes that matters involving the above areas of governance may nonetheless require international intervention where necessary to address transboundary concerns or protect fundamental rights;

  4. Establishes that legislation affecting one or more sovereign competencies shall:

    1. Identify the competencies implicated by such legislation;

    2. Explain the necessity of Assembly action with respect to those competencies;

    3. Preserve the exercise of sovereign authority to the greatest extent consistent with achieving the objectives of that legislation;

  5. Establishes that where legislation affects core sovereign competencies, implementation and enforcement shall be conducted through cooperation whenever reasonably practicable, and that legislation establishing such cooperative mechanisms shall provide procedures for review or appeal of decisions made pursuant thereto;

  6. Mandates that member nations ensure their diplomats or representatives to the Assembly are appropriately instructed regarding their role and responsibilities within this body, recognizing that such instruction is necessary to enable the Assembly to conduct its proceedings through informed participation by its members, while leaving the means by which such instruction is provided to the discretion of each member nation.

Co-authors: Miravana, Merethin

World Census Analysis
W I N N E R S
PatriotismTaxation
L O S E R S
Political Apathy

World Census analysis assumes a typical nation. Individual results may vary.


This General Assembly resolution was authored by Mar Teret and provides specific means by which the ideological principles of National Sovereignty shall be enacted.

The United Regions Alliance recommends that you vote AGAINST this resolution

This resolution declares the areas of governance which member nations have natural and total control over, and sets out the conditions which legislation must adhere to if it affects those areas of governance. The resolution goes on to require that General Assembly legislation take effect through cooperative means, and restates the principles of National Sovereignty that the sovereign authority of member states should be preserved to the greatest extent possible. The URA, however, disagrees with this argument, and thus urges a vote AGAINST this resolution.

Arguments from members of the URA included:

Battadia wrote:Sort of just seems like a wordier version of National Sovereignty, and does a similar amount of stuff. Against due to "not constituent subdivisions of an international federation"

Lycos wrote:National Sovereignty establishes the philosophy, this gives the philosophy teeth by enumerating the rights of nations as the true source of governance, not a so-called international federation. Full support.



Internal voting results

Turnout: 7/12 Members
Weighted turnout: 78.02%


This document was authored by Battadia on behalf of the United Regions Alliance. Please do not reproduce it without permission.
If you have been mentioned in this document and would like to avoid such an occurrence in future, please message here. URA Delegates, as tagged below, may not take advantage of this.
Read dispatch

Forum View

Advertisement