Governor: The People's Republic of Andusre

WA Delegate: The WA Delegate of Rayekka (elected )

Founder: The Owned by Andusre of Thaecia Founder

Last WA Update:

Maps Board Activity History Admin Rank

Most World Assembly Endorsements: 23rd Most Influential: 128th Most Nations: 129th+9
Most Valuable International Artwork: 253rd Most Inclusive: 1,959th Best Weather: 2,010th Most Compassionate Citizens: 2,149th Most Cultured: 2,430th Nicest Citizens: 2,430th Most Extensive Public Healthcare: 2,560th Highest Food Quality: 2,593rd Most Beautiful Environments: 2,691st
World Factbook Entry

Welcome to Thaecia!
Uno pro omnibus, omnes pro uno!


Constitution | Law Registry | Government Overview | High Court | House of Commons | Senate | LinkDiscord Server

Regional News:

  • Thaecia's Political Reset begins following passage of the Fifth Constitution!

  • Elected members for the Constitutional Convention have been inaugurated, check out them out here


Newcomer's Checklist:


World Assembly Recommendations:



Map

This is the map of Thaecia created by The Kingdom of Brototh . It has 2,818 estimated diplomatic weight behind it, the most in Thaecia. It is one of 17 maps of Thaecia.

Embassies: The High Court, The Thaecian Senate, The House of Commons, Assembly of Roleplay, The East Pacific, Alstroemerian Commonwealths, The Glorious Nations of Iwaku, Eientei Gensokyo, The Free Nations Region, Europeia, Lone Wolves United, Balder, 10000 Islands, the South Pacific, the Rejected Realms, Spiritus, and 6 others.The Social Liberal Union, The Order of the Grey Wardens, Sky Haven, Islarabia, Auctoritan Commonwealth, and Kyorgia puppet storage.

Tags: Anime, Anti-Fascist, Democratic, Eco-Friendly, Enormous, Featured, Feminist, LGBT, Liberal, Map, Modern Tech, Offsite Chat, and 4 others.Regional Government, Role Player, Social, and World Assembly.

Regional Power: Very High

Thaecia contains 252 nations, the 129th most in the world.

Today's World Census Report

The Most Stationary in Thaecia

Long-term World Census surveillance revealed which nations have been resident in their current region for the longest time.

As a region, Thaecia is ranked 18,128th in the world for Most Stationary.

NationWA CategoryMotto
1.The Chair Kingdom of CerdeniaAnarchy“Chairs First, the Rest Second”
2.The Incorporated States of European Technocratic UnionCorrupt Dictatorship“The Mechwart is a *good* place.”
3.The Dominion of South Mouse IslandDemocratic Socialists“Si vulpem agas, eius dolis cogita.”
4.The Commonwealth of Skarlagen TreatiesNew York Times Democracy“That’s a Lotta Treaties”
5.The Kingdom of FredestatiaLeft-Leaning College State“Brave men go forward not expecting to return. ...”
6.The Republic of TeaustronFather Knows Best State“By The People For The People”
7.The Union of KryssiniaInoffensive Centrist Democracy“Nåde og Frihet”
8.The Superb Storage Servant of Thaecian Dep AdminInoffensive Centrist Democracy“I am a police officer”
9.The Lengthy Winding Treks of TaunguAnarchy“Spreadin' Dis-caw-rse!”
10.The Rogue Nation of XhuifrakInoffensive Centrist Democracy“Oh we'd be so free”
1234. . .2526»

Regional Happenings

More...

Thaecia Regional Message Board

Record of debate regarding the first Order of business (via Discord):

Democratized Peoples
Undecided on the overall concept of entrenchment clauses. But if we were to do that I'd suggest something a little more concrete. Perhaps:

Section III - Any proposed amendment which impedes the right of the people to freely and openly choose their government or substantially undermines core judicial rights shall not be submitted to the people for ratification nor shall, if ratified by the people, it assume any force or effect.

Lythusia
It's always good to hear good advice. Thanks for the suggestion, I will change the proposal.

Brototh
I'm still not particularly sure about the proposal. For one, I think that entrenched clauses as an idea are not poor, but I do not agree that they should be absolute. I think that if there is anything going to be entrenched, it should only be raising the standard for amendment, not prohibiting it at all. I believe that making an amendment that restricts us, whether it be in a way that we consider good or bad, is not beneficial for the region's future. If in the future we want to do something that might contradict an entrenched clause- we might in the future have really good reason, we can't see the future- then it gridlocks the region. This is not a good way in my opinion to set up a long lasting government.
Additionally, it could just be circumvented by amending out the entrenched clause first, and then doing another amendment - sure, this would be a harder process, but why then not just raise the bar for amending the rights section?

Secondly, I believe that the proposal is simply too up to debate. There is not a better way to word it in my opinion. The issue comes in that there could be a multitude of interpretations on what core judicial rights are, or if the rights are being "substantially" undermined, or the same for the right to freely and openly choose government; it is not clear what this means. Additionally, it could lead to a potential future issue where the amendment is passed uncontroversially but months later is suddenly rescinded by a new Court that disagrees with it. In my opinion, this empowers the Court too much and gives them too much power to legislate from the bench based on their personal opinions.

For these reasons, at vote I cannot support the amendment. However, I would be more inclined to the passage of a clause that entrenches only the contents of Article II; this is more sensible in my opinion and makes less future issues.

Lythusia
I understand the related concerns, I modified the proposal:

Section III - Any proposed amendment which impedes the right of the people to freely and openly choose their government or substantially undermines core judicial rights expressed in the Article II of this Constitution shall not be submitted to the people for ratification nor shall, if ratified by the people, assume any force or effect.

This change would simply serve to protect constitutional guarantees from possible amendments that tend to abolish or limit these rights in an extreme way, amendments that serve to improve these rights would be permitted

It must be the duty of the Judiciary to make the Constitution understood; the Legislature legislates, the Executive implements, and the Judiciary judges and interprets. It is not the duty of the Constitution to interpret itself, it is simply to ensure that it can be interpreted, and this is explicit.

In any case, any form of legal specification is good, thanks for the suggestions and opinions. An experienced voice is key, thank you.

Taralania
Fellas, I do not see a need for there to be a provision within the constitution limiting the right of the legislature to do its job (legislating). Limiting amendments that "impedes the right of the people to freely and openly choose their government" is, frankly, pretty broad. I also cannot find a circumstance within Thaecian history where this has ever been done (limiting freedoms). I cannot find a practical use for this amendment, and do not think it should be supported by the members.

Brototh
I still fundamentally disagree with the notion that as Taralania has said the legislature is restricted from legislating. There is a serious problem in my opinion that this could be unnecessarily harming us in the future by banning constitutional amendments on a specific section. If there is any change, then it should be done in a fashion that makes it harder to amend a section, never impossible. We have seen in the past and even with this convention being held that sometimes even sections that seem to be the most obvious and necessary end up being flawed or need changing. As such, I don’t think that it’s sensible to prohibit amendments on any specific section.
The proposal should read:

Section III - Any proposed amendment to Article II of the Constitution shall require for passage a 3/4ths majority in each Chamber of Congress and the approval of the citizenry with a 2/3rds majority vote in a referendum.

In my opinion, this achieves the same desired effect of protecting rights while also leaving them up to change later if needed. It’s not possible to see the future. That being said, if some sort of “tyrant” acquired the approval of 3/4ths of Congress and 2/3rds of the general population, he probably wouldn’t be much of a tyrant in the first place, since any change to the rights of the people would be done with their overwhelming agreement.

This is regarding the Amendment as proposed by Lythusia

Article I - Supremacy and Amendments
  • Section I - This Constitution is the supreme law of Thaecia, and any law or government action inconsistent with the provisions of this Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force and effect.

  • Section II - Amendments to this Constitution may only be passed with a 2/3rds majority in each Chamber of Congress and the approval of the citizenry with a 3/5ths majority vote in a referendum.

  • Section III - Any proposed amendment which impedes the right of the people to freely and openly choose their government or substantially undermines core judicial rights expressed in the Article II of this Constitution shall not be submitted to the people for ratification, nor shall, if ratified by the people, assume any force or effect.

Read factbook

The member-only vote for the above Amendment is currently underway.

Democratized Peoples - Abstain
The Ambis - Nay
Cosmosplosion - Nay
Snalland - Nay
Rayekka - Nay
New Central Iowa - DNV yet
Lythusia - DNV yet

Rayekka commented on his vote,
I voted Nay as I think the amendment will be too restricting. Amendments require 2/3rds to pass as it is, so I’m theory anything radical or that impedes rights shouldn’t get passed anyway unless it is the will of the people.

The vote will close in 12hrs, considering the majority against it is overwhelming. However, if current 'Nay' votes switch, I may keep it open for longer.

Here is the poll:
https://forms.gle/w6G3LdKnKC4EDUUE6

Here is the poll:
https://forms.gle/rcE9d4TZmaFHTszP8

It has been a year, but I have returned, say, did anyone screenshot my flag? I can't find my file for it.

The Thaecian World Assembly Office recommends you vote AGAINST Airline Safety And Comfort Disclosures.

page=ga

Find the reasoning here:



...
...
...



Current Recommendations
Updated 27th March 2024 by Delegate Rayekka

General Assembly (GA)

Voting Recommendation on: Airline Safety And Comfort Disclosures

Voting Recommendation: AGAINST

REASONING:
The Thaecian World Assembly Office recommends you vote AGAINST this resolution. This is because while the resolution has the best intentions at heart by being customer focused; this resolution is unrealistic and sets a mandate on non-WA nations. Firstly, the resolution would require flights from non-WA airports to WA nations to comply with this resolution. Secondly, the resolution requires the safety & comfort rating of every single flight to be available in physical form in every single language used within a WA state, which could be hundreds; this creates environmental concerns. Finally, there is concern this could harm the Airline business. Air travel is a vital means of transport, and these regulations could result in airlines going bust due to an increase in costs, or more likely lead to airplane tickets rising, bad for consumers.

Security Council (SC)

Voting Recommendation on: Repeal: “Liberate Realm Of The Whispering Winds”

Voting Recommendation: FOR

REASONING:
The Thaecian World Assembly Office recommends you vote FOR this resolution. This is because the region currently cannot set border controls due to the liberation resolution. The region needs the border control powers to protect the historic region from pirates wanting to raid the sea-based roleplay region.



What the WA Office does

Want to know more about what the Thaecian World Assembly Office does? This section will tell you.

The Thaecian World Assembly Office

The Thaecian World Assembly Office is the Office responsible for all things World Assembly (WA) related. The Office represents the elected World Assembly Delegate (WAD) and the Vice Delegate (VD) when the WAD is not available.

The WADs key role is to vote on proposed resolutions in the General Assembly and Security Council. They vote on behalf of the Thaecian region as a whole. Their vote often sways how Thaecian World Assembly citizens vote.

While not required, it is precedent that for each vote the WAD will ask for opinions from Thaecians on a resolution in the Thaecian Regional Message Board (RMB) and/or a dedicated World Assembly channel on the Thaecia Discord server. These discussions and opinions can help a WAD decide how to vote on a proposal, and also allows the opportunity for the Thaecian Government and other senior Foreign Affairs officials to have their input should they wish. Once a decision has been made and a vote cast, the WAD publishes a dispatch stating how they voted and why. It is worth noting that this, again, is precedent and not required by the WAD.

In the World Assembly, before a proposal can be put to vote, it requires to reach a quorum. This can be achieved by getting there resolution approved by WADs. WADs often receive telegrams requesting that they approve a proposal, and whether they do or not is completely up to them.

In Thaecia, the WAD holds an executive regional officer role. This is an incredibly important role with major responsibility, as the executive regional officer role means the WAD can dismiss/appoint other regional officers, close the regions borders and updated the World Factbook Entry (WFE). This means the WAD needs to be a trusted person who only exercises the executive powers when it is the wishes of the democratically elected Government and Congress. The WAD can freely update the WFE in order to keep citizens up to date on WA and regional happenings.

If you'd like to know about the World Assembly itself, scroll down to 'Helpful links' where there are links to WA guides made by esteemed members of the NationStates community.



Advice for Prospective Authors

If you would like to write a proposal for the World Assembly, this section contains the links to the rules for those proposals, and how you can get help and feedback.

Rules

General Assembly (GA): Detailed Rules and Advice
Security Council (SC): Rules



Delegacy Transition Procedures

L.R.042, the Delegacy Transition Act, creates a procedure to be followed when a new World Assembly Delegate is elected. This section will take you through the process.

Procedure

What YOU need to do

  • Endorse the Delegate-elect (and Vice Delegate-elect)

  • Do NOT un-endorse the outgoing Delegate

  • Do un-endorse any other nations that have more endorsements than the Delegate-elect

What the outgoing Delegate will do

The outgoing Delegate is legally required to cast their vote on resolutions, and approve proposals, in line with how the Delegate-elect requests.

What the incoming Delegate will do

The incoming Delegate is legally required to endorse all WA nations in Thaecia for the duration of the transition, and send a mass telegram to all WA nations in Thaecia, reminding them to endorse the Delegate-elect.

...
...
...

Read factbook

- Delegate Rayekka

Gudetamia wrote:Here is the poll:
https://forms.gle/rcE9d4TZmaFHTszP8

Spanish Paellas are so good.

Here is the poll:
https://forms.gle/NWMHHvunHcpe61Vr5

The Southern Dependencies wrote:page=rmb/postid=55359156

NEUQUÉN, Wednesday, March 27, 6:27 P.M (AP) - Following the death of Nemesio Osvaldo, the General Secretary of the Communist Party, the Communist Party is set to meet tomorrow morning to begin the process of electing a new General Secretary. Amongst the candidates are Bartolo Leon (former Premier), John Norman Pritchard (son of Idwal Pritchard, former premier) and the People's Commissar for State Security, Prudencio López de Lacalle.

Since I cannot decide who should be General Secretary of the Communist Party, I'll let the public decide. You might wanna read our history because it mentions some of the candidates, do so here.

Here's the link: https://strawpoll.com/jVyG8Ba0Yn7

Here's some info on each candidate:

Bartolo Leon
Age: 72
Background: Premier from 2002-2014. During his time there was a fear of economic collapse. However, the 1st five year plan of the millennium (2001-2006) saw a major upturn in economic output and the decline in unemployment. Many critics, in the old guard of the Communist Party, feared a move away from Communist ideals and as a result rigged local elections in 2006 to be in favour of more traditional communist party members.

John Norman Pritchard
Age: 64/65
Background: son of the late Premier Idwal Pritchard, who saw the occupation and annexation of the Falklands.
Info: much like his father Ideal, J.N. Pritchard is a believer in the idea of more western style of Government/soft communism. Similarly he has called for modernisation within the Supreme Soviet to make it more diverse politically. However, he is also deeply mistrusted due to several financial scandals and an affair with his mistress.
Info: Bartolo Leon has not been highly involved in the upper echelons of the Communist Party and most consider him a compromise between the Liberal Pritchard and the Conservative López de Lacalle.

Prudencio López de Lacalle
Age: 58
Background: Head of Comisariado del Pueblo para la Seguridad del Estado (the People's Commissariat for State Security).
Info: López de Lacelle is considered on the more conservative side of the Communist Party, a firm believer in the cult of personality forged by the first General Secretary of the Communist Party, Rodolfo Vicente. He is often regarded by the west as dangerous and too sympathetic towards China and Russia, especially in regard to their recent actions toward Taiwan and Ukraine.

If you want more info on candidates, I can happily answer.

Forum View

Advertisement