Governor: The Protection of Saint Michael The Archangel

WA Delegate (non-executive): The Most Serene Dominion of Maekeria (elected )

Founder: The Protection of Saint Michael The Archangel

Last WA Update:

Maps Board Activity History Admin Rank

Most Nations: 345th Most Devout: 354th Most World Assembly Endorsements: 665th+11
Most Cultured: 1,396th Most Valuable International Artwork: 1,484th Nicest Citizens: 1,956th Most Influential: 1,998th Most Cheerful Citizens: 2,012th Lowest Crime Rates: 2,300th Most Compassionate Citizens: 2,575th Largest Black Market: 2,772nd Most Advanced Public Education: 3,020th Most Beautiful Environments: 3,142nd Best Weather: 3,265th
World Factbook Entry

Catholic is a community of Christians loyal to the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church. We hold traditional Catholic beliefs, including in the Trinity and the Immaculate Conception. With the Holy Spirit at our side, we are devoted to the Catholic faith.

St. Michael the Archangel, Linkdefend us in battle.

Join LinkThe Core of Catholics discord server. Here you can become a citizen and collaborate in our regional government!

Per regional law, we strongly suggest not joining the World Assembly.



Embassies: Vatican II, Vatican, Saint Margaret Mary, Right to Life, Catholicism, Coalition of Catholic States, Antarctic Oasis, and Union of Christian Nations.

Tags: Anti-General Assembly, Anti-World Assembly, Featured, Large, and Religious.

Regional Power: Moderate

Catholic contains 83 nations, the 345th most in the world.

Today's World Census Report

The Largest Governments in Catholic

World Census agents lined up at public agencies around the world in order to study the extent of government in nations, taking into consideration economic output, social and cultural significance, and raw size.

As a region, Catholic is ranked 5,114th in the world for Largest Governments.

NationWA CategoryMotto
1.The Serene Christian Republic of New KletersiaInoffensive Centrist Democracy“ORDO ET LIBERTAS AD BONUM POPULI”
2.The Catholic Serene Commonwealth of OmensaInoffensive Centrist Democracy“ELATUM A DEO!”
3.The Republic of Arthur IICorporate Police State“Hard work pays off”
4.The Catholic Republic of The Papal FederationLiberal Democratic Socialists“In illo Uno unum”
5.The Most Holy and Grand Empire of Christian DemocratsNew York Times Democracy“Iesus via et veritas et vita est”
6.The Classical Dominion of FraustinInoffensive Centrist Democracy“Lux Libertatis”
7.The Dominion of John MarkFather Knows Best State“Humilem Ministerium”
8.The Jefature of CathloicIron Fist Consumerists“With polices, more lives”
9.The Rosarians and Chapleteers of Grand CarniolaAuthoritarian Democracy“Slivovka, Sausage, and Slovenian Nationalism”
10.The Organic Vegan Commune of Frustrated FranciscansDemocratic Socialists“Come to the Catholic Church; We have second breakfast”
1234. . .89»

Regional Happenings

More...

Catholic Regional Message Board

Frustrated Franciscans wrote:My nation has had so many backstory changes that I no longer know where it is anymore.

Same

Dominus Vobiscum

Greetings to all; I am also new here, exploring the possibilities, and I believe I have found a good, avowedly Catholic regional environment.
There seems to be some reluctance here to participate in the General Assembly; however, in light of the explanation posted right here regarding the topic "Subsidiarity – The World Assembly – and the Catholic Nation"—and given the apparent reset of the World Assembly itself—there may be room to explore the challenges a Catholic nation faces in defending its principles and sovereignty, shaping other societies according to those principles, or at least ensuring dignified treatment for our faith and for brothers outside our fold, even beyond our jurisdiction.

There is a discussion in the general forum regarding a draft resolution on religious freedom. While it seems positive at first glance, the text—or what it omits—may conceal pitfalls. I believe we could engage with these matters, or at least start our own discussion here to inform the participation of those who are members there.

I apologize in advance if I am not yet fully accustomed to the rules of the game or the norms of participation here.

Spes Immo wrote:Dominus Vobiscum

Greetings to all; I am also new here, exploring the possibilities, and I believe I have found a good, avowedly Catholic regional environment.
There seems to be some reluctance here to participate in the General Assembly; however, in light of the explanation posted right here regarding the topic "Subsidiarity – The World Assembly – and the Catholic Nation"—and given the apparent reset of the World Assembly itself—there may be room to explore the challenges a Catholic nation faces in defending its principles and sovereignty, shaping other societies according to those principles, or at least ensuring dignified treatment for our faith and for brothers outside our fold, even beyond our jurisdiction.

There is a discussion in the general forum regarding a draft resolution on religious freedom. While it seems positive at first glance, the text—or what it omits—may conceal pitfalls. I believe we could engage with these matters, or at least start our own discussion here to inform the participation of those who are members there.

I apologize in advance if I am not yet fully accustomed to the rules of the game or the norms of participation here.

I appreciate the sentiment. I think inactivity in the world assembly in this formative time will lead to ruin.

"I" don't participate in the world assembly. I do, but not the "I" as in this particular nation, and you can only have one nation in the world assembly. And while the jury is "out" on the new edition of the body, the opt out / opt in features are fascinating. Should Frustrated Franciscans decide to join (and kick out my nation of Retired WerePenguins) they could easily not accept the occasional nonsense that the body passes every so often.

Frustrated Franciscans wrote:"I" don't participate in the world assembly. I do, but not the "I" as in this particular nation, and you can only have one nation in the world assembly. And while the jury is "out" on the new edition of the body, the opt out / opt in features are fascinating. Should Frustrated Franciscans decide to join (and kick out my nation of Retired WerePenguins) they could easily not accept the occasional nonsense that the body passes every so often.

I greatly appreciate your writing from many years ago about subsidiarity. Perhaps you should write an addendum with the advent of the WA rework.

Correct me if I’m mistaken, but we still have the option not to adopt a resolution after it’s passed, right? Like, not becoming a signatory to it?

I’m under no illusion—the vast majority there not only fail to share our set of values ​​but are actually hostile to them—yet there are certainly some who are unaware of our reasoning and would be open to it. To my mind, it’s a welcome opportunity to bear witness. We might not stop stupid and malicious resolutions, but we can leave a permanent record of what they violate and disregard.
In fact, someone is currently trying to push through a resolution framing euthanasia as a fundamental right and a matter of transnational policy.

Frustrated Franciscans wrote:"I" don't participate in the world assembly. I do, but not the "I" as in this particular nation, and you can only have one nation in the world assembly. And while the jury is "out" on the new edition of the body, the opt out / opt in features are fascinating. Should Frustrated Franciscans decide to join (and kick out my nation of Retired WerePenguins) they could easily not accept the occasional nonsense that the body passes every so often.

Always nonsense laws. That's Nationstates now. The problem liberal communist ideals.

Speaking of the WA, could some folks endorse me? I wish to write resolutions but I need two endorsements to do so. (I know they are unlikely to go through, but I would like to try)

Maekeria wrote:Speaking of the WA, could some folks endorse me? I wish to write resolutions but I need two endorsements to do so. (I know they are unlikely to go through, but I would like to try)

Alright. But I think just WA members can do it.

I personally think it would be more useful to form a Catholic advocacy group of nations in the WA regardless of region rather than trying to levy the power of one Catholic region. People usually want to participate in robust political communities instead of tying up their WA nation in a religious region. So that has been the option I have thought about pursuing lately.

Forum View

Advertisement