Russian Armed Forces

Moskiev wrote:

I like how both leftists and we who are considered and viewed as conservatives, are both against private companies owning strategic resources lol. PC really have only one ally in this fight.

I'm gonna just start by saying I'm sure you recognize who I may just be, I just made this nation because it fits better to be talking in here.

How one views economic privatization is not consequential with how socially liberal or conservative you are. Communism and Fascism both sit on fairly opposite sides in terms of social policies yet they both have common ground in centrally managed economics. What you state here really doesn't mean much without an implication that your social stances are enough to identify your economic stances. A "leftist" can be either very laissez-faire in their economic ideology, or very state-centric. They are independent factors, albeit tend to correlate. The common denominator is how communal your beliefs are whether that be through left-wing revolutionary nature (socialist) or right-wing traditionalism (often religious-based).

(side note: personally not informed enough on the fascism end of things as to the extent of their social policies specifically, which is why I say "fairly opposite")

Iosif Vissarionovich Stalin wrote:

My brother in Eastern Europe, we live in countries that for 40 years before US overlordship over earth lived under a system where all these things were ran or at least overseen by state, and even before that had central authority oversee much of strategic development. For us it IS conservatism, because it's what our past is like.

sounds about right. Much of western past is far more liberal. The height of liberal economics in America was in the very late 1800s to early 1900s, the progressives of the time favored more state interventions just like they still do now, comparatively to modern western conservatives that more or less want that liberalism back as opposed to the status quo of social-democrat leaning nanny-state level of state interventions. I myself find ordoliberalism pretty interesting. First I came across the concept was unfortunately a bad case of someone who definitely favored state intervention of economy (which I don't agree with, clearly) while using the excuse of being "fair" because capitalism at large can only apparently be understood as corporatocracy.

Hello brothers! We hope at A Reasonable Region to have long lasting relations with you!

Also can someone tell us about the mutual defence treaties you have? We’re very interested 👀

Amuje Loyalists what is wrong with same gender love? dose it bother you in public? no, so what's the problem, mind your own sexuality.

Moskiev wrote:

I am thinking to use the term 'western companies' when talking about western groupations that project power onto the world stage, because it looks those companies now have more power and decision options than legacy states. And I am saying this as the real situation on the ground, not to mock western people how they dont have statehoods implying mockery, in fact I am telling how this is bad for them, they are the victim, they are not accused of crimes commited by companies.

Who makes all the weapons in the west? Or atleast the most of it? Big private companies.

Who holds most of the industry, agriculture and finance? Big private companies.

Media? Private companies.

Healthcare? Private companies.

Insurance? Private companies.

Airlines and space crafts? More and more private companies.

US law legally recognized corruption as lobbying efforts. Private companies pay and donate to politicians to enact/cancel laws that go/doesnt go to companies favor. Which in the long term makes politicians dependant and accountable to the private companies, not people. As time goes by, more and more laws are twisted to favor companies, not people, all to the point where companies dont exist and work for the sake of people, but vice versa.

Whats the first thing they say in the news when some war or crisis start? 'The economy is taking the toll', 'companys stocks fell for...' They never start with how events affect the people, but companies.

And no, when I say private companies, I also mean public corporations. Because lets be real here, ordinary people dont invest there or have a say. Its all big private money, and private decisions made by small group of people appointed in those boards by concensus of either big money or big players (which is actually the same, just the money being their tool).

so Wagner and all the oligarchs in Russia dosen't exist