The South PacificBoard

New American Dictatorship wrote:

The creation of the english language is fairly complicated, keep in mind. Old english isn't the same as modern english

the english language that evolved into what it is today, was made by the kingdom of england during the 100 years war, before they kinda spoke french. :0

Federal Eagle Colony wrote:

a eye, for a eye.

Thanks for proving me right.

Federal Eagle Colony wrote:

the english language that evolved into what it is today, was made by the kingdom of england during the 100 years war, before they kinda spoke french. :0

The Normans strolled up at some point and were like "Nah, we're better"

The concept of Enemies to Lovers makes almost no sense and it rustles my jimmies everytime I see fanart of it.

The Helleness wrote:

Hello everyone

Howdy

New American Dictatorship wrote:

The Normans strolled up at some point and were like "Nah, we're better"

Strolled? More like rolled over. Normans weren’t anything to snear at.

Drystar wrote:

Upper class spoke French, in its time was considered the “universal” language, like Latin at one point, and English today.

Bro this convo is the most wild thing ive ever seen

Greetings!

Drystar wrote:

I’m not sure what you’re fishing for, other than trying to set up for a ban. I think the ideas being promoted are asinine at best, and total ignore the species history, but I’m not going to punish people for keeping their stupid beliefs to themselves.

Satiating genuine curiosity. I'm not impressed, not a well executed argument.

Too vague. Asked for evidence supporting their belief, was provided more assumptions and claims without sources.

Zambeziland wrote:

I think what he's saying is that if you allow different culture groups to stay separate and not integrate and assimilate, you'll basically have a de-facto segregation like South Africa, Rhodesia, Chicago or Milwaukee. Look at Somalis in Sweden. That went horribly. The Somali immigrants refused to integrate and assimilated and they brought their tribal rights with them and so they restarted gang fights in Stockholm with Grenades

The claim is for assimilation as opposed to diversity, but I live and among mainly with people who do not share my culture and those claims are not the reality I witness. Some of those around me don't even speak my language at all. I can tell they don't really have an interest and that's not really something I hold against them, it's difficult learning a new language, so we do our best to make do with alternatives. It's not something that causes animosity, but curiosity and creativity when working together.

I'm not convinced in the slightest, but you have provided something a bit more concrete to look to so I'll look into that. If you have sources to provide that would make it much easier on me, thanks.

Lion Tribe123 wrote:

>:( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfJA_0DOAfs

Just follow the rmb rules, it's not that difficult 😅

Danny McGlurk wrote:

I thought they spoke Old Norse and Celtic languages.

....maybe during the romans......but no.

Republic of Rhode Island wrote:

Thanks for proving me right.

no. i think that fair is fair, you commit hate, you get hate, you get what you give.

Differences-In-Differences wrote:

This is the best flag. It has the correct opinions.

Well I didn't choose it