The South PacificBoard

Greater new rhodesia and nyasaland wrote:

Your a fellow neutral nation, so you're fine...

And me???

North Finslisia wrote:

And me???

I suppose... But I mean we'll be cautious towards nations in alliances, Ie avoiding them...

Valiraisia wrote:

But…
Why would they destroy you?

genrally after they tried to kick out someone for war crimes i had to admit i had done them as well and someone said "seriously" and a big push to kick me out happended

Petea wrote:

Founder?! Oh mate, Iʻm sorry to hear that

yeah ive been with them for just under a year now been with them since i started so i dont know my current dirrection

Greater new rhodesia and nyasaland wrote:

Well, after the incident with The British Imperialism, Rhodesia will be more careful and suspicious of other nations...

im certainly more suspicous of them

Petea wrote:

Seems like the desire was to kick Imperial Japan, and you were collateral damage

yup i belive their "anti authoritarian" stance may not be desirable for TSP seing them as one of if not the biggest current alliance that why there need to be a third party alliance between TUP and SPU

Insulae libertatis wrote:

there becoming more interventionist as we speak and i belive trivavle is going to get voted out as leader and replaced with a more trigger happy one and when that happens i wont exist much longer

Its nearly impossibe for Trivale to be thrown out.. he is more of a leader than most SPU members.

Insulae libertatis wrote:

yup

Yeah...

Greater new rhodesia and nyasaland wrote:

Well, MIJ was nothing but trouble...

is trouble lol sheʻs back now, aye?

Bistritza wrote:

Or maybe Japan was the argument used while Insulae was the target

No not really, my main goal was MIJ.

North Finslisia wrote:

@Canadom, when there will be election for the LC?

Well, it is supposed to be July but its on halt for now

Insulae libertatis wrote:

its morbin timethere becoming more interventionist as we speak and i belive trivavle is going to get voted out as leader and replaced with a more trigger happy one and when that happens i wont exist much longer

There are preventative measures in place if someone who can't lead starts messing up the SPU as leader, it is called Sir Zanny. I had the idea a while ago that if the SPU started dying because the leader was tyrannical or couldn't do their job, we could kick them out of office and make a joint council leadership until a new leader is voted in.

North Finslisia wrote:

Why?????

it's the GC and stuff.