Post

Rommeria wrote:

As I said, that depends on demographic situation. I see nothing "regressive" there, this is mere pragmatism. But, yeah, ban on contraception is extreme, I can agree. I installed this policy accidentally and probably will cancel it once I get the chance.I would not call it outright authoritarian for this case. Though since I am an authleft, I do not care either way. State provides the citizens prosperity and safety (at least it should, ideally) and in return citizens should have their own responsibilities to the state. Which of course involves producing new citizens for continuation of the state and society.
For me it seems natural. "Whims" of the state and economy? Does not socialism include collectivism? Does not collectivism mean giving a group priority over individual in it?

Collectivism must represent the interests of the proletarian people and must also embody the will of the proletarian people.the state is supported by the people, The people are users of the state apparatus.Therefore, it is the duty of the State to ensure security for the people.While people are forbidden to have abortions, they are deprived of their corresponding rights, it is a manifestation of the state apparatus and interest groups in turn oppressing the people.According to "pragmatism", is it necessary to force each couple to have four children in order to promote the population?
Then arrange the menstrual police to check the female ovulation period?The last person who did this has died.The people have abandoned him and the socialist country.