Search

Search

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .19,14019,14119,14219,14319,14419,14519,146. . .20,55920,560»

FSPR wrote:If I may ask, what is endo cap?

Nations can recieve a maximum endorsement number of 150 if I can remember. Though the reason is mainly for the region's security reasons and stuff

New Astri wrote:(except for me because i'm a very special boy aka rmb moderator and i get lots of endos so i can have lots of influence to banject troublemakers with. also, i'm thinking of doing an official survey to see if tcb is interested in the endo cap being raised once the summer lull ends)

Heyy doesn't the priority of mods getting more endos make TCB kinda like a bureaucracy? Ik you said that jokingly but let's get serious for a sec, mods shouldn't be allowed more endos just because they're mods as their work is voluntary and communal. Not wanna criticise everything just sayin
Oh and if the endorsement cap is updated I suggest making a system similar to The Leftist Assembly where common members have much more power. We could raise it to 300 for norm members and 600 for vice delegates? Idk but definitely raise it over 250 pls :)

Carrico wrote:That’s not even true, the US officially supports the status quo and does not support Taiwan independence. Pelosi took the world one step closer to nuclear war today with her visit, which can be seen as nothing short of the West attempting to throw their power around in the region. The US is directly interfering with China’s internal affairs. They chose to ignore China’s polite warnings, but there will be consequences. China—US ties are officially at their worst point ever. We are lucky China isn’t as hellbent on nuclear warfare as the US clearly is, so the response will be measured and calculated.

Comrade I totally agree: The US and almost everyone doesn't care about Taiwan because it's now a lost cause. Pelosi is doing what they're doing for a very specific reason. The US is continuously poking China with a price embargo and North Korea with nukes, that's why North Korea doesn't give up nukes, because the US threatens them. China unfortunately always reacts to the US late because... well, they aren't an agressive hellhole of bigots who wants to destroy the planet, like USA is. And seems as though lots of Americans support the nuking of China as I've seen comments on Instagram saying ''we'll drop a fat ass nuke on y'all chinese commies'' getting thousands of positive reactions.

The Antarian Commonwealth, RUBP, Socialist indian republics, and Ruberian

4D Donkeys wrote:Heyy doesn't the priority of mods getting more endos make TCB kinda like a bureaucracy? Ik you said that jokingly but let's get serious for a sec, mods shouldn't be allowed more endos just because they're mods as their work is voluntary and communal. Not wanna criticise everything just sayin
Oh and if the endorsement cap is updated I suggest making a system similar to The Leftist Assembly where common members have much more power. We could raise it to 300 for norm members and 600 for vice delegates? Idk but definitely raise it over 250 pls :)

i mean. going by the definition of "a system of government in which most of the important decisions are made by state officials rather than by elected representatives," tcb's staff functioning is literally a bureaucracy, but so are most other regions on NS. you don't get to elect the mods, the admin team picks them. that's normal.

being a mod means that i need to have more influence than the average rmber so i'm capable of banjecting whoever i need to banject. that means i get more endos so i can collect influence faster than the average rmber.

vice delegates have no cap beyond "don't overtake kethania's endos (and don't be close enough for a del bump to be possible)."

i'm definitely not raising the cap above 250. we already occasionally are irritated by having to spend absurd amounts of influence to ban troublemakers who have collected a lot themselves. having the 160 endos that we allow is enough to put a nation in the top 0.5% of the world statistically for endorsements, so we don't really need to raise the cap much higher than it is already. i may add ten, possibly twenty more to the limit if we can consistently stay at 700 endos on micha.

(also not sure why you're conflating endorsements with power or believing that tla cits have more power than tcb cits?)

anyway, endos ultimately aren't some special power meter, they're just a tool used to obtain influence. the people in the region who actually need to have influence naturally get more access to that tool, whereas people who have no need for it can just sit back and enjoy their top 0.5% in the world endorsement stats.

New Astri wrote:i mean. going by the definition of "a system of government in which most of the important decisions are made by state officials rather than by elected representatives," tcb's staff functioning is literally a bureaucracy, but so are most other regions on NS. you don't get to elect the mods, the admin team picks them. that's normal.

being a mod means that i need to have more influence than the average rmber so i'm capable of banjecting whoever i need to banject. that means i get more endos so i can collect influence faster than the average rmber.

vice delegates have no cap beyond "don't overtake kethania's endos (and don't be close enough for a del bump to be possible)."

i'm definitely not raising the cap above 250. we already occasionally are irritated by having to spend absurd amounts of influence to ban troublemakers who have collected a lot themselves. having the 160 endos that we allow is enough to put a nation in the top 0.5% of the world statistically for endorsements, so we don't really need to raise the cap much higher than it is already. i may add ten, possibly twenty more to the limit if we can consistently stay at 700 endos on micha.

(also not sure why you're conflating endorsements with power or believing that tla cits have more power than tcb cits?)

anyway, endos ultimately aren't some special power meter, they're just a tool used to obtain influence. the people in the region who actually need to have influence naturally get more access to that tool, whereas people who have no need for it can just sit back and enjoy their top 0.5% in the world endorsement stats.

Извините, что отвлекаю. Я про игру не вмешиваюсь, но разве не цель коммунизма в реальной жизни, что все люди равны и власть рабочим и крестьянам? Скорее это уже социализм, где кто-то более главнее. Так у нас в СССР все всегда стремились к коммунизму. Заметьте я все перевел, но возможно в переводе есть ошибки. Заранее говорю, что систему вашего управления в Коммунистическом блоке я не осуждаю.

Translation: Sorry to interrupt. I'm not interfering about the game, but isn't the goal of communism in real life that all people are equal and power is given to workers and peasants? Rather, it is already socialism, where someone is more important. This is how everyone in the USSR has always aspired to communism. Note that I have translated everything, but there may be mistakes in the translation. I say in advance that I do not condemn your management system in the Communist Bloc.

Rysfffffd wrote:Извините, что отвлекаю. Я про игру не вмешиваюсь, но разве не цель коммунизма в реальной жизни, что все люди равны и власть рабочим и крестьянам? Скорее это уже социализм, где кто-то более главнее. Так у нас в СССР все всегда стремились к коммунизму. Заметьте я все перевел, но возможно в переводе есть ошибки. Заранее говорю, что систему вашего управления в Коммунистическом блоке я не осуждаю.

Translation: Sorry to interrupt. I'm not interfering about the game, but isn't the goal of communism in real life that all people are equal and power is given to workers and peasants? Rather, it is already socialism, where someone is more important. This is how everyone in the USSR has always aspired to communism. Note that I have translated everything, but there may be mistakes in the translation. I say in advance that I do not condemn your management system in the Communist Bloc.

see the key phrase there is "real life" and this is not real life this is an outdated browser game where whoever is willing to do all the work is just given the resources to do all the work

New Astri wrote:see the key phrase there is "real life" and this is not real life this is an outdated browser game where whoever is willing to do all the work is just given the resources to do all the work

Перед моим высказыванием скажу, что я не пытаюсь вас оскорбить и осудить вашу систему управления. А теперь начнем. Я говорю, что ваша система управления напоминает социализм,где кто-то где-то главнее, а не коммунизм, где власть народу. А так-то мне вообще безразницы на вашу систему управления. Как и большинсто россиян у меня просто громадная политическая апатия на все это. Дальше мне будет трудно говорить без русского мата, поэтому закончу тем, что управляйте как хотите, но стоит признать, что это социализм, а не коммунизм. Ибо так и есть.

Translation: Before my statement, I will say that I am not trying to insult you and condemn your management system. Now let's get started. I say that your management system resembles socialism, where someone is in charge somewhere, and not communism, where the people have power. As it is, I don't care about your management system at all. Like most Russians, I just have a huge political apathy for all this. It will be difficult for me to speak further without a Russian mat, so I will end up saying that you manage as you want, but it is worth recognizing that this is socialism, not communism. For so it is.

Rysfffffd wrote:Перед моим высказыванием скажу, что я не пытаюсь вас оскорбить и осудить вашу систему управления. А теперь начнем. Я говорю, что ваша система управления напоминает социализм,где кто-то где-то главнее, а не коммунизм, где власть народу. А так-то мне вообще безразницы на вашу систему управления. Как и большинсто россиян у меня просто громадная политическая апатия на все это. Дальше мне будет трудно говорить без русского мата, поэтому закончу тем, что управляйте как хотите, но стоит признать, что это социализм, а не коммунизм. Ибо так и есть.

Translation: Before my statement, I will say that I am not trying to insult you and condemn your management system. Now let's get started. I say that your management system resembles socialism, where someone is in charge somewhere, and not communism, where the people have power. As it is, I don't care about your management system at all. Like most Russians, I just have a huge political apathy for all this. It will be difficult for me to speak further without a Russian mat, so I will end up saying that you manage as you want, but it is worth recognizing that this is socialism, not communism. For so it is.

it's actually not socialism Or communism because this is an online browser game and not a legitimate economic system

Canadian democratic republics, Socialist indian republics, 4D Donkeys, Martalla, and 1 otherThe transgender anarchic zone

Canadian democratic republics wrote:classification? Do you mean pretitle?

Yes oh ok thx UFROE

Lussr wrote:Yes

If it's not at 500 million pop, then you unlock it at 1 billion pop

Lussr

Canadian democratic republics

New Astri wrote:it's actually not socialism Or communism because this is an online browser game and not a legitimate economic system

Whaaaaat, this Isn't real life!?! I am shook.

Socialist indian republics

Socialist indian republics

Rysfffffd wrote:Извините, что отвлекаю. Я про игру не вмешиваюсь, но разве не цель коммунизма в реальной жизни, что все люди равны и власть рабочим и крестьянам? Скорее это уже социализм, где кто-то более главнее. Так у нас в СССР все всегда стремились к коммунизму. Заметьте я все перевел, но возможно в переводе есть ошибки. Заранее говорю, что систему вашего управления в Коммунистическом блоке я не осуждаю.

Translation: Sorry to interrupt. I'm not interfering about the game, but isn't the goal of communism in real life that all people are equal and power is given to workers and peasants? Rather, it is already socialism, where someone is more important. This is how everyone in the USSR has always aspired to communism. Note that I have translated everything, but there may be mistakes in the translation. I say in advance that I do not condemn your management system in the Communist Bloc.

Even the USSR did have a legal system which had individuals more powerful than ordinary citizens, so that they could actually enforce anything.

Socialist indian republics wrote:Why does the PRC government oppose her visit so strongly? The US has always rejected the One China policy, so this would not be something new.

You can take a look at the content of Chinese Ambassador Qin Gang's interview with CNN about the US House of Representatives Speaker Pelosi's visit to Taiwan. Ambassador Qin Gang answered your related questions.

Socialist indian republics

Rysfffffd wrote:Перед моим высказыванием скажу, что я не пытаюсь вас оскорбить и осудить вашу систему управления. А теперь начнем. Я говорю, что ваша система управления напоминает социализм,где кто-то где-то главнее, а не коммунизм, где власть народу. А так-то мне вообще безразницы на вашу систему управления. Как и большинсто россиян у меня просто громадная политическая апатия на все это. Дальше мне будет трудно говорить без русского мата, поэтому закончу тем, что управляйте как хотите, но стоит признать, что это социализм, а не коммунизм. Ибо так и есть.

Translation: Before my statement, I will say that I am not trying to insult you and condemn your management system. Now let's get started. I say that your management system resembles socialism, where someone is in charge somewhere, and not communism, where the people have power. As it is, I don't care about your management system at all. Like most Russians, I just have a huge political apathy for all this. It will be difficult for me to speak further without a Russian mat, so I will end up saying that you manage as you want, but it is worth recognizing that this is socialism, not communism. For so it is.

NS is just a web game, our bloc is more like a left-wing alliance than a left-wing party, it's just a club that plays NS and is interested in socialism

Socialist indian republics and Ruberian

Rysfffffd wrote:Перед моим высказыванием скажу, что я не пытаюсь вас оскорбить и осудить вашу систему управления. А теперь начнем. Я говорю, что ваша система управления напоминает социализм,где кто-то где-то главнее, а не коммунизм, где власть народу. А так-то мне вообще безразницы на вашу систему управления. Как и большинсто россиян у меня просто громадная политическая апатия на все это. Дальше мне будет трудно говорить без русского мата, поэтому закончу тем, что управляйте как хотите, но стоит признать, что это социализм, а не коммунизм. Ибо так и есть.

Translation: Before my statement, I will say that I am not trying to insult you and condemn your management system. Now let's get started. I say that your management system resembles socialism, where someone is in charge somewhere, and not communism, where the people have power. As it is, I don't care about your management system at all. Like most Russians, I just have a huge political apathy for all this. It will be difficult for me to speak further without a Russian mat, so I will end up saying that you manage as you want, but it is worth recognizing that this is socialism, not communism. For so it is.

And the purity of our bloc is not very high, similar to the Paris Commune, anarchists and communists are present in our bloc (even pro-capitalist traitors)

4D Donkeys
By the way, I remember you're an anarchist, right? Anarchism seems to be divided into many factions, I think you also agree with the theory of Marxism, are you an anarcho-communist? I'm curious about the ideology of anarcho-communism, it's hard to find information on this in mainland China👀

Socialist Republics of China wrote:And the purity of our bloc is not very high, similar to the Paris Commune, anarchists and communists are present in our bloc (even pro-capitalist traitors)

Yeah,but here is still "OUR" region,a comrade bloc!

Socialist Republics of China wrote:And the purity of our bloc is not very high, similar to the Paris Commune, anarchists and communists are present in our bloc (even pro-capitalist traitors)

What do you mean by purity? I'm a little confused as to what you're saying here
Do you mean that the Bloc has a very diverse number of political ideologies?

Post self-deleted by UFROE.

UFROE wrote:What do you mean by purity? I'm a little confused as to what you're saying here
Do you mean that the Bloc has a very diverse number of political ideologies?

It can only be said that there are many left-wing ideas. After all, our nature suggests that we cannot be as highly organized and pure as political parties.

Socialist indian republics

UFROE wrote:What do you mean by purity? I'm a little confused as to what you're saying here
Do you mean that the Bloc has a very diverse number of political ideologies?

But in the face of a unified and powerful enemy, we still have to unite. After all, untimely infighting is nothing more than weakening one's own strength, just like Wang Ming's purge during the Chinese revolution

Socialist indian republics

Socialist Republics of China wrote:It can only be said that there are many left-wing ideas. After all, our nature suggests that we cannot be as highly organized and pure as political parties.

I'm still a little confused (probably cuz i need sleep) but I will say that TCB is a very complex community, and we manage to have a highly efficient government despite some flaws in our system.

Socialist Republics of China wrote:But in the face of a unified and powerful enemy, we still have to unite. After all, untimely infighting is nothing more than weakening one's own strength, just like Wang Ming's purge during the Chinese revolution

As far as fighting "unified and powerful enemies" goes we don't have any unified or powerful enemies to fight against, but we sure are unified as a whole in the fight against fascism and bigotry within nationstates

UFROE wrote:I'm still a little confused (probably cuz i need sleep) but I will say that TCB is a very complex community, and we manage to have a highly efficient government despite some flaws in our system.As far as fighting "unified and powerful enemies" goes we don't have any unified or powerful enemies to fight against, but we sure are unified as a whole in the fight against fascism and bigotry within nationstates

Yes, fascism and imperialism will always be our enemies and the enemies of peace-loving peoples all over the world

Canadian democratic republics

4D Donkeys Guess who reached 1b pop, time to plan out the free Canadian pork and flannel shirts gift baskets.

The Antarian Commonwealth, Socialist indian republics, and 4D Donkeys

New Astri wrote:i mean. going by the definition of "a system of government in which most of the important decisions are made by state officials rather than by elected representatives," tcb's staff functioning is literally a bureaucracy,

Technically true, as the way NS works means that RO's are appointed and cannot really be directly elected.

Except....historically pretty much all the RO's have also held elected roles, and have been appointed on the basis of past performance in those roles.

Ergo, you could argue that it's partially a meritocracy.

Socialist Republics of China wrote:4D Donkeys
By the way, I remember you're an anarchist, right? Anarchism seems to be divided into many factions, I think you also agree with the theory of Marxism, are you an anarcho-communist? I'm curious about the ideology of anarcho-communism, it's hard to find information on this in mainland China👀

Yes, I'm probably an anarcho-communist and I guess the systems of so called ''anarcho-syndicalism'' and ''anarcho-collectivism'' are very similar if not exactly the same thing, if you ever heard of them. I believe in marxist theory and I also consider myself anarcho-feminist since I value the worker's rights as much as women's rights.

What I stand for: Actually I'm not anarchist in the traditional sense, I don't believe that communism can be brought immediately after the collapse of a capitalist country. That's not possible, and if tried it would be very dangerous abolishing all laws and rights immediately because it would make the territory more like anarcho-capitalism not socialism. Like, imagine if one day you woke up and hierarchy was abolished, some individuals, because they're still products of capitalism, they'll bring it back by begining to opress others. I also believe in human rights, that everybody should have equal rights but not infinite rights. Someone in history said ''when everyone has infinite rights, opression begins where your rights interfere with somebody else's'' and that's correct for me. But I definitely believe that currency, property, state, marriage, family, genders, laws, hierarchy should all be abolished in an advanced socialist society. I also don't agree with how Makhnovtchina worked, I would prefer the Soviets. If you don't know, Makhnovtchina is Anarchist Ukraine at the time of 1918-1921.

What I agree on with anarcho-communism: Personal property, like a family-owned bakery, or a personal phone or watch or toothbrush, for mostly health or convenience reasons. Also I completely agree with direct democracy, that no politicians can ever truly represent us no matter how good they are, power always corrupts anyone that meets it. And since we've all had different interractions with the universe and grew up in a different way, living in a different body, we can't fully understand one another. Thus, direct democracy. But also parties will be useful in a transitionary period between capitalism and socialism, I'm not denying the usefulness of parties, especially the vanguard party. I also agree with other concepts of anarcho-communism but I should move on to write more important stuff below.

What is anarcho-communism? You might even see it as ''an-com'' or ''ancom'' which are slang terms for anarcho-communism. I don't know if Wikipedia is blocked in China, so here's half of the first paragraph of ''Anarcho-Communism'' from the Wikipedia: ''Anarcho-communism, also known as anarchist communism, (or, colloquially, ancom) is a political philosophy and anarchist school of thought which advocates communism. It calls for abolition of private property but retains respect for personal property along with collectively-owned items, goods and services. It supports social ownership of property and direct democracy among other horizontal networks for the allocation of production and consumption based on the guiding principle "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs".'' Yes anarcho-communism gives respect on personal property, like a personal toothbrush or shirt that only you can wear, for health reasons ofcourse, or for family-owned operations. I can't know if this is relevant in a socialist society, though. I don't know if eventually personal property will be abolished, the people will decide.
This is the article here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-communism#:~:text=Anarcho%2Dcommunism%2C%20also%20known%20as,owned%20items%2C%20goods%20and%20services.
Here's another article: https://libcom.org/article/anarchist-communism-introduction
As I can see I can't find much information on anarcho-communism online

Those are the major concepts of ancom: Anti-authoritarianism, Anti-capitalism, Anti-statism, Class consciousness, Class conflict, Classless society, Common ownership, Common resources, Commune, Consensus democracy, Co-operative economics, Direct democracy, Egalitarian community, Free association, "From each according to his ability,
to each according to his needs", General strike, Gift economy, Give-away shop, Market abolitionism, Mutual aid, Prefigurative politics. All of these are a selection from the Wikipedia, again.

The most important anarcho-communists: Déjacque, Makhno, Kropotkin, Cafiero, Covelli, Malatesta, Goldman, Galleani, Magón, Berkman, Bleikhman, Durruti, Volin, Faure, Bookchin, Meltzer, etc

Here are some videos on anarcho-communism made by anarcho-communists:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cy1eRCYS08w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bFqkQL6mhM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4GcUISYwJw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5lCv24nRmM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_RdRdRr7-HE
And here is some anarcho-communist music:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UuYL8AwzZjY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kajwqrIT00g
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKhwitXvVj8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CulagmnFhg

Anarcho-capitalism, terrorism, primitivism, nihilism, illegalism, insurrectionism, egoism, accelerationism, individualism, agorism are all terrible and anti-leftist, even if some of them claim to be leftist. I highly suggest not getting influenced by their ideas. But you should check them out if you want to.

Therlica

«12. . .19,14019,14119,14219,14319,14419,14519,146. . .20,55920,560»

Advertisement