«12. . .4,3674,3684,3694,3704,3714,3724,373. . .8,7468,747»
We also send our condolences to the Cossack people
Is it "death penalty" if I let prisoners rot in a 2x2 meter cell and only give them 2 liters of water and a single potato as sustenance per day? Would that be in line with the World Assembly legislation?
Delta Vega IV, Gaiaguay, and Divine egypt
Well, it's a good way to make pedophiles and serial killers suffer, but I personally prefer a firing squad or a bayonet charge
What the hell is going on in Myanmar? Now the military is bombing their own people. They are bloody sick.
Post self-deleted by Demonos.
Indian phonebanks?!? You shouldwnt trust them with your torturing. They'll just cut corners. You should consider using New Vedanian Mafia groups instead. They might cost a little more, but they are region renown for there brutality and thoroughness. They'll torture your prisoners correctly or you'll get your money back.
Post self-deleted by Demonos.
Why waste resources on housing them in cells and giving them food and water? We here in Egypt find beheading or hanging them does the trick.
Us here usually do this as well (although we prefer the good old burning at the stake), but since the world assembly banned the death penalty we are kind of in a tight spot. Although we could try to let them burn until they are almost dead, then quickly put out the fire and abandon them in the wilderness while the wounds are still fresh.
I don't understand how people have enough time to micromanage their endorsements at that level of detail. Once I've given an endorsement the only times I remove it is if they are over the endorsement limit, or if they submit a really silly proposal in the World Assembly.
Delta Vega IV and Hraban
Honestly, I don't get it either.
(IC: Let's check ... yup the Capital Punishment (don't say Death Penalty it's seem gross and barbaric), well back to the the point, unfortunately the question was submitted to referendum and this punishment was reintroduced again until the next one.
Of course being a progressive and advance nation, we do it as (trans)humanly as possible. For digital citizens does imply a deactivation and deletion of the criminal. Of course copies done before the crime are innocent and spared. The storage and computing power of the deleted are redistributed between the general population as a reparation to society.
For biological people we do it as quick and serene as possible in a medical installation, where the sentenced it's euthanized in a fast, reliable and painless way and the biological remains are reclaimed for research of reused for industrial use.
We are very proud of the efficiency of our environmental and recycling services.)
I got another weird issue.
My nation used to allow gay marriage but according to an issue I received, my government enforced restrictive sexual laws against homosexuals.
What's the deal? I was restrictive against gays but let them marry?
YoUr nAtIoN NaMe iS ThE IsLeS Of gReAt bRiTiAn aNd iReLaNd, iReLaNd iS InDePeNdAnT1!1!
Not in my version of the UK it's not.
Lazarus is my favorite GCR!
Treadwellia, New vedan, Demonos, and Moaning Lisa
Tubbius the Fat gives two mmphs up in agreement!
Delta Vega IV, Demonos, and Moaning Lisa
What did you do to cause a Black Market?
What's more serene than the smell of burning heretics and traitors in the morning?
Alternatively we could force them to commit suicide by sword. After all we follow 7 blood oaths. Meaning if you break even one of those oaths you have to pay for it in blood, meaning you die
We're confused at your hot take here because we signed on to find that your nation had withdrawn its endorsement even though our endorsement remained, and according to the timestamps, you did it around the same time as your post. We, of course, have since unendorsed your nation, but we remain perplexed at how you would target yourself with a post that way.
You have the heterosexuality policy, so you must have answered an issue previously that caused that policy to appear.
So gay marriage is allowed but homosexuality itself isn't?
No. The Heterosexuality policy means that gay marriage is not allowed. The two policies are the opposite of each other, i.e. you can only have one or the other, never both. Having the heterosexuality policy means that gay marriage is not allowed.
«12. . .4,3674,3684,3694,3704,3714,3724,373. . .8,7468,747»
Advertisement