LazarusBoard

Noting that criminals might find excuses for offensive behaviors committed if the resolution is to be passed, the Principality and on behalf of His Royal Majesty, vote firmly against Military Death Penalty Ban.

"This bill would not only encourage sinful actions against the peaceful behaving citizens within the Federal state, it would also be a shame to the strength to our peacekeepers, and the pride of our nation. Hereby, with the royal senate voting for 300 versus 674 against, Trontasky expresses its strong opposition against such unjustified appeal."- Rar Chidiv, Supreme Chancellor of the Federal Principality

-------------------------------------------------------

Might is our testimony; Victory is our destiny!
Prince Vispasial II

Liberty and unity wrote:

Regarding the recent WA vote, I have this to say

The death penalty is needed for all circumstances to deal with murderers, rapists, human traffickers, child molesters, and pedophiles

And traitors. Don't forget them.

Liberty and unity wrote:

yes, them too
and I forgot to add terrorists

And for those who touch the Pharaoh but are not permitted to. Or is that just a thing in my country?

Hraban wrote:

The main governing body of the golden Realm of Hraban agrees with this statement but would like to add rebels, protesters and people who speak badly about our divine leader to the list.

Our leader is divine too! We should be allies.

Delta Vega IV wrote:

Israel

I wish you luck.

Aigania wrote:

I'll take the bait.

Even going to the heart of capitalism, the U.S., there was alternatives to the present day disaster. the enforcement of the FCC fairness doctrine it its time, the equal-time rule.

Or how they like to talk about "capitalism" and "competence", they could begin to break down the excessive media consolidated conglomerates, that from the political and economic manipulation to the polarization (good for the numbers!), to the generic blandness and low quality music has produced with the standardization of "tastes" across the board.

And of course there is alternatives beyond that. Quality public broadcasting services, community owned media and son on.

Yes, but the author will always impart their own implicit bias. Some people just think the world works differently and value things differently from others. Also, I wasn't trying to bait you.

Liberty and unity wrote:

Well in the Allied States, protestors and people who disagree with us are allowed to voice their opinions. We hold the right to protest essential

Over here, we have two little things called freedom and capitalism. Come on down to MuderCo™ and pay to have somebody killed! But while you're here, don't forget to hire a protection service or at least pay for justice insurance to make sure you don't get murdered and that if you do somebody else gets dead for it!

Liberty and unity wrote:

well that's corporatism if I've ever seen it

Unfortunately not, we still have a small government and some taxes :(

We also do not believe in "devine rulers". We only believe in "by the people, for the people, with the people"

Arclandia wrote:

We disagree with you, however...

It is our pleasure to have voted with you as it is our belief that the WA shouldn't be telling us what to do with our official policy banners. If it's a policy strip that goes in our splash tab, the WA shouldn't be able to create legislation that strips it away. It is the right and duty of the people to step up and strip their governments of power, not an even larger governmental body to push those governments' decisions for them.

If you, like us, find yourself morally and ethically opposed to the WA's overreach, you can join us in our voting protest policy: when the WA offers a repeal of any of their poorly worded and overreaching legislation, we vote for it. Whenever they vote to add new laws, we vote against it. It's super simple, and we vote the same way in the SC. The WA needs to know we aren't going to let them do whatever forever.

You are correct. The WA have been controlling us for far too long. Unfortunately, there isn't much we can do other than vote for or against their laws/repeals

Liberty and unity wrote:

We also do not believe in "devine rulers". We only believe in "by the people, for the people, with the people"

"By the people, for the consumer, with the markets" you mean.

Liberty and unity wrote:

No
"By the people For the people, With the people"
People above money
Others above self
Humanity before corporations

No
"By the people, for the consumer, with the markets"
People above government
The customer is always right
The markets will sort out everything

Liberty and unity wrote:

no

No?