Search

Search

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .8,6678,6688,6698,670

Boilanzandia wrote:Plus Nova Imperii
I am suing both Rhenzern and The H Corporation for improper conduct befalling that of an RP administrator and committing abuse of power knowingly.

I'm sorry what's going on?

Manndorria wrote:I'm sorry what's going on?

You can sue people here.

Nuebatus wrote:You can sue people here.

Like with the rules in Callista and how does it work who will be the judge?

Manndorria wrote:Like with the rules in Callista and how does it work who will be the judge?

Plus Nova Imperii is the Head Justice

Boilanzandia wrote:Plus Nova Imperii is the Head Justice

Oh I just looked up at the jobs. Sorry for being oblivious.

Im shocked but there are a lot of people in Callista that are iron fist consumerists.

Here we go again.

I will not get involved in the court case however I am disappointed overall in the conduct of Rhenzern and H surrounding this RP scandal. Whether they are guilty or not is up to Rome to decide but overall it doesn’t look very good on their character.

Also this is a grey area according to the constitution so this should be constitutional

ARIsyan- wrote:Here we go again.

I will not get involved in the court case however I am disappointed overall in the conduct of Rhenzern and H surrounding this RP scandal. Whether they are guilty or not is up to Rome to decide but overall it doesn’t look very good on their character.

Also this is a grey area according to the constitution so this should be constitutional

What's the scandal about?

Nuebatus wrote:What's the scandal about?

Basically Rhenzern brought the communists into power in Greece so he could have a cassus belli to invade them, which Boil sees as an abuse of power as Greece is a NPC country and Rhen shouldn’t have the power to implement something that directly benefits him as MORP.

Now I myself was considering switching to a nation in Greece because I’m getting a bit bored with Catalonia and I was briefed by Rhen before he made his post about the communist revolution, however it is still a dubious decision and I’m not really liking the precedence this sets for future MORPs.

Anyways it’s for the courts to decide so I’ll stay out of it unless I’m called to the stand as a witness.

Nuebatus wrote:What's the scandal about?

its complicated, but in short rhenzern and h Corp willingly and knowingly abused their power by making the unreasonable and unrealistic decision to put Greece at a disadvantage.

Boilanzandia wrote:That's funny considering that China never did that in recent modern history. Hey, I think Japan did the exact scenario you're describing - oh wait I wonder how that turned out. Yet you blame China instead.

Vietnam has been Sinicized (in the same way Thai culture is considered to be influenced by India) for a long time, as has Japan... China has often intended to exert control over other countries, but yes, nothing quite like the blatantly exploitative EACPS.

Boilanzandia wrote:why is bro using me as an example :/

Cause you're probably closer to me than anyone else.
Galactic Powers, in the future, maybe specify PRC. (For example, in reference to putonghua and standardization of Chinese/decline of dialects)

For how much y'all use the phrase casus belli, you show limited ability in spelling it.

Rio Paraguay wrote:For how much y'all use the phrase casus belli, you show limited ability in spelling it.

Mb for adding an extra S

Rio Paraguay wrote:For how much y'all use the phrase casus belli, you show limited ability in spelling it.

I don't know how to spell :/

Royal Cormoe, what'll the effective range of your guns prove to be? I might like some meatshields myself, since naval aviation is still a ways off.

Rio Paraguay wrote:Vietnam has been Sinicized (in the same way Thai culture is considered to be influenced by India) for a long time, as has Japan... China has often intended to exert control over other countries, but yes, nothing quite like the blatantly exploitative EACPS.Cause you're probably closer to me than anyone else.
Galactic Powers, in the future, maybe specify PRC. (For example, in reference to putonghua and standardization of Chinese/decline of dialects)

Is this about me and Boil’s debate? One of my points was that it doesn’t matter who is in charge of China, as the processes by which a Pan-Asian union would be formed, in my opinion, violate what I consider important (self-sovereignty and diverse ethnocultural regions). The PRC being dictatorial was onl part of the issue.

Galactic Powers wrote:Is this about me and Boil’s debate? One of my points was that it doesn’t matter who is in charge of China, as the processes by which a Pan-Asian union would be formed, in my opinion, violate what I consider important (self-sovereignty and diverse ethnocultural regions). The PRC being dictatorial was onl part of the issue.

What if it ends up just being an expanded ASEAN? And, I dunno, balkanization of China or smth

Galactic Powers wrote:Is this about me and Boil’s debate? One of my points was that it doesn’t matter who is in charge of China, as the processes by which a Pan-Asian union would be formed, in my opinion, violate what I consider important (self-sovereignty and diverse ethnocultural regions). The PRC being dictatorial was onl part of the issue.

Europe has many distinct cultures and ethnic groups, and the EU has worked well.

Rio Paraguay wrote:What if it ends up just being an expanded ASEAN? And, I dunno, balkanization of China or smth

CHINA WILL NOT BE BALKANIZED RAAAAAAAAAAH!11!1!!1!!1 (chinese Nationalist noises)

Boilanzandia wrote:CHINA WILL NOT BE BALKANIZED RAAAAAAAAAAH!11!1!!1!!1 (chinese Nationalist noises)

though yes i agree that if the majority of tibet and east turkestan want independence, they should have it
(my father would be inclined to disagree)
i'm less sure about Taiwan, I would prefer an ROC takeover of all of china

Rio Paraguay wrote:What if it ends up just being an expanded ASEAN? And, I dunno, balkanization of China or smth

ASEAN is congruous with a greater sociocultural region. Throw in Japan or Kazakhstan and you’ve gone too far.

Boilanzandia wrote:Europe has many distinct cultures and ethnic groups, and the EU has worked well.

Because the EU is formed of states that either a) were united in their fear of Soviet Russia, and thus had a shared economic/political goal, or b) are post Cold-War expansions into regions that went reactionary against the Russians. Imagine if the EU added Russia to its membership. Then you’ve basically got what a Pan-Asian union would be.

Not to mention European cultural identity has been neutered by progressivism in the Wester European states who remain the core members (which took WW2 and partition to force on the Germans), while those who retain their cultural identity (Eastern Europeans mostly) remain the main internal troublemakers in the Union.

Imagine that with three times the population, with systems spanning from Islamic theocracy to securely state capitalism to liberal democracy, with far more actual ethnic groups to contend with, and you get Pan-Asianism.

Boilanzandia wrote:though yes i agree that if the majority of tibet and east turkestan want independence, they should have it
(my father would be inclined to disagree)
i'm less sure about Taiwan, I would prefer an ROC takeover of all of china

If east turkestan gains independence it is IMMEDIATELY becoming an Islamic theocracy. Tibet would follow Bhutan’s political system probably which I don’t have any qualms with.

Taiwan has its own cultural identity and should be left on its own, so I support Taiwanese independence. Same with Hong Kong and Macau and Inner Mongolia.

«12. . .8,6678,6688,6698,670

Advertisement