Post

Prov wrote:

Judge Ben: not granted, can you do your closing statement so that the jury may vote

(When I say sum up my cases that's what I mean) Alright.

I believe there is not enough evidence to prove the crozo soldier guilty. First of all, he could not have helped the terrorists kill prince because the prince was shot right as he went in, even if that was not the case, the terrorist was likely a sniper, so he might've not seen the terrorist until he sniped the boy, remember, there were no windows. And besides that there is no direct proof he killed the boy. Therefore, he is completely innocent on ALL charges. And even if he complied with the terrorists, he definitely did not kill the prince. But I am saying he did neither, and I have plenty of proof to back that up, the proof which I just stated. I rest my case. Also, the killer shot the price with a gun, so the killer would not need to touch the prince. And if the soldier killed him, the the gun would've been at the scene, but if the terrorists killed him, which they did, they would've ran away with their guns.