«12. . .378379380381382383384. . .844845»
April 15th, 2015: The region was founded.
September 2015: The region starts actively collecting embassies. Guardian Network (now CTEd) was the region to beat for the most embassies, along with SECFanatics and [region]The Bar on the Corner in Every Region/region] (2 collectors still around today, well TBH sorta ruined SECFanatics but...).
The Founder CTEs (unknown date): The Wolf Clan moves in for the kill and raids the region and ordered many embassies closed. Fortunately (or unfortunately, seeing as I have TWC affiliation) TITO (ugh, fendas) moved in and cancelled this. But no one had enough influence to add a password to protect the region. According to The ambassadors reception (who I will get to in a bit) "The solution was for The magical puppet to eject a load of nations. This depleted their influence, but with fewer nations in the region, A Goblinoid Merchant then had enough influence to add a password. The region was safe.
June 2020: The raiders were salty, they wanted The Embassy. So they went to the SC and tried to get the region liberated, but it didn't pass.
Q:How did you get started in the region?
A: After TITO had rescued all the embassies, it seemed a wasted effort if the place just got raided again. I advised The magical puppet & A Goblinoid Merchant how to go about adding a password (which sounds easy, but it's made complicated by having to calculate the influence needed).
Q:What's the weirdest occurrence in your RMB?
A: Hmm. Hard to say. But I remember being surprised when a three-year old nation discovered that they could post on embassy RMBs.
Q:Do you accept jobs?
A: Do you mean, "Do we accept nations into The Embassy?"
Not usually, no. It's a security risk to let people in.
Short, not my best writing. But I'm still looking for a really juicy story to occupy my time.
The ambassadors reception, The Gold Mines, Sail nation, and Colin advance wars
I oppose fission owing to the nuclear waste. Fusion is not yet a proven technology, so safety from nuclear accidents is a concern. Wind, tidal, geo-thermal, and solar are the preferred more environmental friendly methods. I would have included hydro-electric, but large dam construction projects have proven too disruptive to river basins with their dependent ecosystems. The sooner humans move away from wood, coal, oil, and all other greenhouse gas producing fuels, the better for our Earth.
Wind and solar have pathetic outputs, meaning big farms, meaning their environmental benefits are negated, that and solar involves a really toxic manufacturing method and wind poses a danger to birds and also causes noise pollution. Tidal could work, but then it's really just wind energy converted to work underwater. Not sure about geothermal, not enough information to answer.
We both oppose fossil fuels, that's for sure. Only thing is some of my family works in the oil industry, and I'm not going to tell them to "lEaRn To CoDe".
As for the waste, as I stated before, it's being worked on. It can potentially be recyclable.
Hello everyone guten tag jeder
Random Country 453632 and Colin advance wars
I think it's probably worth you revisiting those points. I've not been keeping up to speed, but I'm sure I read that California was producing more solar than it could consume.
Why are big farms a bad thing? Is this not an argument that could be applied to agricultural farms or golf courses too?
Presumably more friendly methods of production are being investigated?
Apparently less than you'd think:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/science-environment-48936941
2016 report about people actively looking to address this problem, and starting to find solutions:
https://www.power-technology.com/features/featuresilent-flight-suppressing-noise-from-wind-turbine-blades-with-owl-inspired-coating-4643523/
OBJECTION!
The problem with all of this arguments is that solar and wind power just work on specific zones, for example it's not like I could put a solar plant on Siberia can I, because there's not enough sun or wind to power them, that's why nuclear power is more reliable. because nuclear power plants can be built anywhere and everywhere, yes nuclear waste is a problem, but humanity has also been developing ways to get rid of it more easily and sometimes nuclear waste can have some use, as their components sometimes can be used to create new elements, such as when uranium decays, it becomes helium.
Idk, therE's Some G00d in all Of us.
Or that's what the suicide line told me, lol.
Sysillia and Who cares bro 2
C00l, just don't steal from us or we will nuke then invade u (I don't care if my soldiers get cancer, lol) then burn all heresy and install the G word.
Also an instance of singing happened.
That's a big "If", son. Solar would only be most reliable at the equator. We both agree that wind is clunky, and loud I'd say. About the nuclear waste, we're working on ways of recycling it.
Another alternative would be hydrogen cells. You can find hydrogen literally anywhere. Also free water for anyone who needs it.
«12. . .378379380381382383384. . .844845»
Advertisement