BalderBoard

Aelyria wrote:

1. Given your leader has a male name, it is unlikely you would be interested in my nudes.
2. Even if you were, I'm afraid we would be rather ineffective at "repopulating" anywhere.
3. I don't know you, there is no way I would send you something like that, you could be a minor!

1:Repopulation is key.
2:most of this region consist out of minors.

i'm sorry if this question may result inappropriate, but is this region sploinky?
and if so, is it also very yoinky?

Every nation needs complete justice.

Japerlasa wrote:

so you'd have no problem sending nudes to non-minors? that doesn't sound very christian

If the recipient is an adult, capable of giving consent, and actually requested the pictures, how could it possibly be a problem? Like I'm genuinely confused here.

Note that this does not mean that I would definitely do so all the time if those conditions were met. You have made an error on reasoning. Firstly, these are merely necessary conditions, not sufficient ones: just because I would say "no" if any of them fail to be true does not, in any way, mean that I MUST say yes if all of them are true. I might do so if every condition is met, but I definitely will not do so if any of them aren't.

Secondly, "you could be a minor" is just one example of why "I don't know you" is a reason not to comply with that request. Other, less extreme examples are, "you could be disingenuous," "you could be trying to get leverage over me," or "you could be someone I'm not interested in." The fact that the user could be a minor is one very serious concern, but it's not the only reason to be concerned!

Elvya wrote:

no thank you, your nation looks a bit too scary for my liking

Well your nation has one of the biggest crime rates in the world.

Holy saganianispoli wrote:

Well your nation has one of the biggest crime rates in the world.

so what? if one wants to bash someone else's head with a brick, let them do so! this is a free country, after all

my citizens ain't scary, they're just misunderstood :(

Elvya wrote:

so what? if one wants to bash someone else's head with a brick, let them do so! this is a free country, after all

my citizens ain't scary, they're just misunderstood :(

So I can come and blast up your population :)

Elvya wrote:

so what? if one wants to bash someone else's head with a brick, let them do so! this is a free country, after all

my citizens ain't scary, they're just misunderstood :(

⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠿⠛⠛⠛⠋⠉⠈⠉⠉⠉⠉⠛⠻⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠋⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠛⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⡏⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣤⣤⣤⣄⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⢿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⢏⣴⣿⣷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣟⣾⣿⡟⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⢢⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣟⠀⡴⠄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿
⣿⣿⣿⠟⠻⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠶⢴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿
⣿⣁⡀⠀⠀⢰⢠⣦⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡄⠀⣴⣶⣿⡄⣿
⣿⡋⠀⠀⠀⠎⢸⣿⡆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠗⢘⣿⣟⠛⠿⣼
⣿⣿⠋⢀⡌⢰⣿⡿⢿⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⢸⣿⣿⣧⢀⣼
⣿⣿⣷⢻⠄⠘⠛⠋⠛⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢿⣧⠈⠉⠙⠛⠋⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣧⠀⠈⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠟⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⢃⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⡿⠀⠴⢗⣠⣤⣴⡶⠶⠖⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⡸⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⡀⢠⣾⣿⠏⠀⠠⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠛⠉⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣧⠈⢹⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣰⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⡄⠈⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣠⣴⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣠⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⣄⣀⣀⣀⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⡄⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⠀⠀⠙⣿⣿⡟⢻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠇⠀⠁⠀⠀⠹⣿⠃⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠛⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢐⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠛⠉⠉⠁⠀⢻⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⠈⣿⣿⡿⠉⠛⠛⠛⠉⠉
⣿⡿⠋⠁⠀⠀⢀⣀⣠⡴⣸⣿⣇⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡿⠄⠙⠛⠀⣀⣠⣤⣤⠄

Elvya wrote:

if you find it scary it's just because you're a wuss!
a wuss afraid of societal norms, while I'm free and happy!

The let my ''peacekeeping force'' into your country.

Sorry guys I accidentally suppressed a few posts by hitting the wrong button 😭

Self harm wrote:

-snip-

You can have Mrs. Fluffypants, she is a retired war kitty. Although we removed most cybernetic implants, the laser vision and razor claws are still present, and her armor is sub-dermal. A consequence of these implants is she weighs a ton and a half.

Omgosh yay!!

Aelyria wrote:

Only if you promise to take good care of it and keep it clean after, ahem, "walkies."

-snip-

I'll take amazing care! And will definitely clean up ☺️

Txom2 wrote:

—————————————

I believe that this resolution is against freedom, liberty, and the democratic process.

Understood; I am for this resolution.

Japerlasa wrote:

that's an interesting question. architecturally, it could be done. but that doesn't necessarily mean that just because we can, means we should. first and foremost, cities are built to be convenient. if our disease limiting efforts become obstacles for everyday life, no one will want to live there.

i think the most effective way of limiting the spread of disease is education. as with most things.

There are certainly things that could be done. Consider, for example, the move toward "enclave" civil engineering: making city spaces where jobs, shopping, residence, and entertainment are all within walking distance, or at most a very short drive (e.g. less than 5 minutes). This would slow down the spread of any infectious agent by making it so most folks don't travel that often between their city enclaves.