Post

Region: Balder

Japerlasa wrote:that's an interesting question. architecturally, it could be done. but that doesn't necessarily mean that just because we can, means we should. first and foremost, cities are built to be convenient. if our disease limiting efforts become obstacles for everyday life, no one will want to live there.

i think the most effective way of limiting the spread of disease is education. as with most things.

There are certainly things that could be done. Consider, for example, the move toward "enclave" civil engineering: making city spaces where jobs, shopping, residence, and entertainment are all within walking distance, or at most a very short drive (e.g. less than 5 minutes). This would slow down the spread of any infectious agent by making it so most folks don't travel that often between their city enclaves.

Vinmark kritarchy

ContextReport