«12. . .2,1782,1792,1802,1812,1822,1832,184. . .2,5822,583»
i'm sorry if this question may result inappropriate, but is this region sploinky?
and if so, is it also very yoinky?
Your country is quite the anarchy. Should I send a ''peace force''.
(just a small chance that I'm accidentally burning down your forest whit my drones)
Every nation needs complete justice.
no thank you, your nation looks a bit too scary for my liking
If the recipient is an adult, capable of giving consent, and actually requested the pictures, how could it possibly be a problem? Like I'm genuinely confused here.
Note that this does not mean that I would definitely do so all the time if those conditions were met. You have made an error on reasoning. Firstly, these are merely necessary conditions, not sufficient ones: just because I would say "no" if any of them fail to be true does not, in any way, mean that I MUST say yes if all of them are true. I might do so if every condition is met, but I definitely will not do so if any of them aren't.
Secondly, "you could be a minor" is just one example of why "I don't know you" is a reason not to comply with that request. Other, less extreme examples are, "you could be disingenuous," "you could be trying to get leverage over me," or "you could be someone I'm not interested in." The fact that the user could be a minor is one very serious concern, but it's not the only reason to be concerned!
I didn't mean it that way.
Well your nation has one of the biggest crime rates in the world.
jazz stops
so what? if one wants to bash someone else's head with a brick, let them do so! this is a free country, after all
my citizens ain't scary, they're just misunderstood :(
Vocomia and Self harm
So I can come and blast up your population :)
I think we have very different definitions of "scary."
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠿⠛⠛⠛⠋⠉⠈⠉⠉⠉⠉⠛⠻⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠋⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠛⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⡏⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣤⣤⣤⣄⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⢿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⢏⣴⣿⣷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣟⣾⣿⡟⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⢢⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣟⠀⡴⠄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿
⣿⣿⣿⠟⠻⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠶⢴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿
⣿⣁⡀⠀⠀⢰⢠⣦⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡄⠀⣴⣶⣿⡄⣿
⣿⡋⠀⠀⠀⠎⢸⣿⡆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠗⢘⣿⣟⠛⠿⣼
⣿⣿⠋⢀⡌⢰⣿⡿⢿⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⢸⣿⣿⣧⢀⣼
⣿⣿⣷⢻⠄⠘⠛⠋⠛⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢿⣧⠈⠉⠙⠛⠋⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣧⠀⠈⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠟⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⢃⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⡿⠀⠴⢗⣠⣤⣴⡶⠶⠖⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⡸⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⡀⢠⣾⣿⠏⠀⠠⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠛⠉⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣧⠈⢹⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣰⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⡄⠈⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣠⣴⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣠⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⣄⣀⣀⣀⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⡄⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⠀⠀⠙⣿⣿⡟⢻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠇⠀⠁⠀⠀⠹⣿⠃⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠛⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢐⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠛⠉⠉⠁⠀⢻⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⠈⣿⣿⡿⠉⠛⠛⠛⠉⠉
⣿⡿⠋⠁⠀⠀⢀⣀⣠⡴⣸⣿⣇⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡿⠄⠙⠛⠀⣀⣠⣤⣤⠄
if you find it scary it's just because you're a wuss!
a wuss afraid of societal norms, while I'm free and happy!
The let my ''peacekeeping force'' into your country.
Here's a question for the members here. Do you think a city could be designed to minimize the spread of diseases, viruses etc, despite their large populations and means of mingling? Also, to quickly answer a potential question.. no, this isn't inspired by Covid. I actually have been thinking about it for many years before that. I have some of my own ideas on the topic, but I'm curious to what others might be.
that's an interesting question. architecturally, it could be done. but that doesn't necessarily mean that just because we can, means we should. first and foremost, cities are built to be convenient. if our disease limiting efforts become obstacles for everyday life, no one will want to live there.
i think the most effective way of limiting the spread of disease is education. as with most things.
I think there could be some technologies that could, together with a complementary city design, reduce the spread of disease. But as Japerlasa says, im not sure if that would be ideal, mainly because cities dont have that purpose, and im not sure that one could match its main purpose (act as a living/economic centre) with diffusion of diseases. Qnd even if u could, it would be extremely costly, mainly in terms of planning and design
Sorry guys I accidentally suppressed a few posts by hitting the wrong button 😭
Omgosh yay!!
I'll take amazing care! And will definitely clean up ☺️
Well, it already passed.
But regardless: I agree, it does deny the sovereignty of Confederacy of Layem. However, that is an in-character issue. Out of character, the people of Layem have done some truly bad things. We're really stepping outside of this game with its nations and regions and such, and considering that we no longer want these players here.
Odin / Bormiar
Balder's Senior Deputy Minister of World Assembly Affairs
There are certainly things that could be done. Consider, for example, the move toward "enclave" civil engineering: making city spaces where jobs, shopping, residence, and entertainment are all within walking distance, or at most a very short drive (e.g. less than 5 minutes). This would slow down the spread of any infectious agent by making it so most folks don't travel that often between their city enclaves.
«12. . .2,1782,1792,1802,1812,1822,1832,184. . .2,5822,583»
Advertisement