«12. . .261262263264265266267. . .301302»
Just wait, solve issues prohibiting capitalism and you'll become one
Its more fun that way!
Depends on how or where the revolution starts and who leads it. We must not forget that communists always retained a strong presence here. The communists were one of the most important factors behind Indian independence, Bhagat Singh and his HSRA, the Telangana Rebellion and the 1946 Naval Revolt are some of the many examples. After the partition communists in both India and Pakistan(primarily East Pakistan) played an important role. The CPI(M) ruled West Bengal and Tripura and continues to rule Kerala(which is imo the best state in India).
The communist parties are still strong compared to other countries and there is discontent among the working class, especially the farmers. After all, 250 million people took part in the All-India Strike, so I would say that with proper leadership there could be a socialist revolution in India, and in turn across the whole subcontinent.
Well if India goes fascist all the more reason for China to come "liberate" it in classical USA fashion.
"Conflict is the trade of kings" - John Dryden
Those 250 million workers may not have been communists or socialists(or not all of them). But neither were most workers in countries where revolutions happened. This was the case during the Russian Revolution as well. Communists, the vanguard of the masses, must lead the revolution and seize power and then earn the workers trust. Also as a Bangladeshi communist I have keen interest in politics of India, and the subcontinent in general.
We need to seize the World Assembly and liberate nationstates from Fascism, capitaöism and oppression
Seize the means of World Assembly! ☭
Anasychkinark and European union of marxist republics
Post self-deleted by Gloucester City.
The WA is, imo, one of the most undemocratic institution in NS (regarding the fact, that delegates votes weight as much as their region has members, thus practically doubling those votes) and simply another instrument of oppression (since WA-membership forces a nation to act in the way of any WA decision and changing stats of said nation accordingly without any option to deny this - reminds me of the 'love it or leave it' policy of the McCarthy era) of nations in favour of a few 'big players'; same goes for the 'security council', where (same system) nations or regions are commended or condemmed on the behalf and will of practically a few 'delegates'.
I´d say, we all should boycott the WA, and ignore the puny little games of fascists and capitalists as what they are : a camouflage of the oppression of free nations.
That's actually a genuine idea.
We should boycott it and form a new institution with all progressive and revolutionary regions in nation states
Hey i got a new topic to debate, should we boycott UN too?(bcs it's biased too for non permanent members)
Guys we must unite. We, who see what is going on and to not fight with the ones who are still sleeping. Hate is bad. The unity is the power. Let's show them this time! (some little slav quote there)
and yes I may randomly post quotes I know and think are good to hear
We need a new debate topic! Oh yeah got one, what are the flaws according to you that led USSR to lose cold war(except Gorbachev)?
The country, while moving away from full dictatorship, failed to fully eliminate the bureaucracy. They failed to raise the standard of living for people in the USSR and its satellites, so when Capitalism began creeping back in, they had nothing to show for repelling it, so the "communist" ideology began to crumble. However, once the USSR did fall, Russian people simply found themselves having to work even harder to just maintain the lifestyle they already had. It only became worse, except for the forming Russian Oligarchy.
Baldwin Park and Far out
«12. . .261262263264265266267. . .301302»
Advertisement