Search

Search

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .19,05019,05119,05219,05319,05419,05519,056. . .20,50920,510»

Canadian democratic republics

Granva wrote:hello here are the result of a political test that explains why i am in the union / contruticvsime = 31 - 17 = essentialisme / justice réhabilitive = 38 - 31 = justice punitive / progressime = 24 - 43 = conservatisme / internationalisme = 50 - 31 = nationalisme / communisme = 90 - 7 = capitalist / regulatione = 40 - 38 = laissez faire / ecologic = 57 - 21 = productivisme / revolutione = 55 - 29 = reformiste.

I wouldn't trust those political quiz sites, they can be very misleading. Only use them as a foundation or finding new perceptive on things.

Canadian democratic republics wrote:I wouldn't trust those political quiz sites, they can be very misleading. Only use them as a foundation or finding new perceptive on things.

I personally don't believe all those political tests are correct; I identify as libleft on the compass although I think there's no such thing as ''authoritarian'' and ''libertarian'' leftism, because they're one thing, like, why would a communist be ''authoritarian'' since leftism by itself is ''libertarian'' no matter what, no matter if it's a more conservative form of leftism like stalinism or a more progressive one like trotskyism or posadism. At least that's for me, my opinion. Why should we split the left in two different sections? Well if I were to split the left in 2 sections, the first one would be ''bureaucratic leftism'' such as reformism or stalinism, in which the governemnt is supposed to voluntarily help the proletariat, and the second section would be ''leftism from the classes below'' which is controlled directly by the people and is not a bureaucracy by some political party. Ok I know it's kinda vile putting stalinism in the same category with reformism but eh, I still know the legendary ussr was better than some common reformist capitalist country.

Canadian democratic republics wrote:I wouldn't trust those political quiz sites, they can be very misleading. Only use them as a foundation or finding new perceptive on things.

Agreed. Everyone, please beware of these political tests and the bias and motivations behind said tests. The Political Compass is trash and was created by a libertarian for the purposes of recruiting new people to the "libertarian" cause. It works as great propaganda, and the test almost always gives one a heavily skewed "libertarian" result. It also divides politics into a very false and misleading dichotomy of "authoritarian vs libertarian". It has done some serious damage to how people understand politics in the modern day. The whole thing is very liberal, individualistic, and anti-communist in nature.

Manndown, Canadian democratic republics, Bovad, Zitherstadt, and 4 othersSocialist Indian Republics, Ataral, 4D Donkeys, and Manchukurun

Jishuin wrote:By the way, how did you first develop feelings for religion, good or bad?
When I was young, my family taught me not to believe these things and said that this is not a good thing. At the time, I didn't understand why they said that. Until I was in middle school, I didn't think religion was something that taught people to be good. Until a few Christians I met regularly on the bus made me change my mind. They preach on the bus that their god is omnipotent and that everything is created by God. Then they saw that I was young and gave me a booklet which I didn't even put in my pocket and got out of the car. I read that pamphlet and I hated Christianity. It says that everything you receive is a gift from God, and it also says that all the achievements since the founding of the country are the will of God. Didn't all this construction come from the people? Why did this group of people come to take credit? So I have no interest in religion. And Marx also said that religion is the spiritual opium that anesthetizes the people, so I went to study some mainstream religions, and after I came to the conclusion that they were all closed and dogmatic, I completely stayed away.

Well, our country (USSR), religion was criticized, and from childhood everyone was told that miracles and supernatural beings only exist in fairy tales, and if someone tries to use references to this in science, medicine or politics, this is a dangerous swindler. Religion was criticized mainly for the fact that it interfered with the development of science and technology, and interfered with the struggle of the poor for better living conditions (religion served by the ruling classes). This was also shown in examples: at school they could demonstrate experiments that were used by churchmen to imitate "miracles", such as "turning water into wine", "healing bloody wounds" or spontaneous combustion of candles - exposing deception and manipulation. At the same time, curiosity arose to religious doctrine, symbolism and aesthetics were pre-revolutionary, unfamiliar, as alternative as Western pop culture. Some kind of cross, church dome or Easter cake was referred to antiquity, sometimes interesting. Well, after the restoration of capitalism, it became clear that the church and its doctrine really serve the ruling classes, cultivate medieval backwardness and cannot do without repressions against opponents.

Rommeria wrote:On the topic of abortions, I think that should be decided depending on the demographic sutuation. If the state has the need for larger population, abortions should be restricted. If it faces overpopulation, then abortions can be allowed in all cases. My nation is going to restrict abortions and contraception. We need more workforce and recruits in our struggle against capitalist world.

It is in this question that one can clearly see how humanistic socialism differs from barracks pseudo-socialism. Socialism aims at the elimination of alienation and coercion in the most important questions of life. To avoid economic coercion to work, you need a benefit or basic income for the unemployed. In order to avoid alienation in politics, everyday life and culture, there must be many opinions and groups, many genres of art and lifestyles within the framework of the left paradigm. To avoid forced childbearing, abortion and contraception should be available. Where all this begins to be violated, socialism degenerates from humanistic into barracks, and loses its attractiveness in the eyes of the masses. Subsequently, this causes passive or active support for the counter-revolution by these masses.

Jishuin

Canadian democratic republics

Carrico wrote:Agreed. Everyone, please beware of these political tests and the bias and motivations behind said tests. The Political Compass is trash and was created by a libertarian for the purposes of recruiting new people to the "libertarian" cause. It works as great propaganda, and the test almost always gives one a heavily skewed "libertarian" result. It also divides politics into a very false and misleading dichotomy of "authoritarian vs libertarian". It has done some serious damage to how people understand politics in the modern day. The whole thing is very liberal, individualistic, and anti-communist in nature.

THIS

Welfare and paradise

Carrico wrote:

Agreed. Everyone, please beware of these political tests and the bias and motivations behind said tests. The Political Compass is trash and was created by a libertarian for the purposes of recruiting new people to the "libertarian" cause. It works as great propaganda, and the test almost always gives one a heavily skewed "libertarian" result. It also divides politics into a very false and misleading dichotomy of "authoritarian vs libertarian". It has done some serious damage to how people understand politics in the modern day. The whole thing is very liberal, individualistic, and anti-communist in nature.

How about the 8values test

Canadian democratic republics

Welfare and paradise wrote:How about the 8values test

Just tread carefully with any quiz sites, no matter what political affiliation they say they're from. 9 out of 10 times it's just skewed and words were taken out of context.

Canadian democratic republics

Canadian democratic republics wrote:Just tread carefully with any quiz sites, no matter what political affiliation they say they're from. 9 out of 10 times it's just skewed and words were taken out of context.

For example, I tried out those 8values and Political compass tests before. Both came out as Libertarian.

Does anyone know how to make an embassy?

Montago wrote:Does anyone know how to make an embassy?

Only regions can make embassies between each other in game. Embassy between nations is related to roleplay and factbook.

Montago

Brezzia wrote:Only regions can make embassies between each other in game. Embassy between nations is related to roleplay and factbook.

Got it, thank you.

Post self-deleted by Jishuin.

Post self-deleted by Bovad.

Canadian democratic republics

Anyone that's gifted in the art of making state emblems hit me up soon. I am the worst at making anything artistically.

Thanks,

Best regards, SFCDR.

im going to mention the most controversial political topic ever:

Ketchup or mustard?

Southwest America wrote:im going to mention the most controversial political topic ever:

Ketchup or mustard?

Mayo

Southwest America wrote:im going to mention the most controversial political topic ever:

Ketchup or mustard?

Ketchup, easiest question I’ve been asked on this region

What would you do if you have been defeated by the Catgirls?

Post by The worst north korea suppressed by New Astri.

The worst north korea

Feyrisshire wrote:What would you do if you have been defeated by the Catgirls?

Only thing at that point is to commit honorable sudoku

Feyrisshire wrote:What would you do if you have been defeated by the Catgirls?

Join them.

Feyrisshire wrote:What would you do if you have been defeated by the Catgirls?

Impossible…it can’t be! That’s not true! That’s impossible! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

Welfare and paradise

Southwest America wrote:im going to mention the most controversial political topic ever:

Ketchup or mustard?

Ketchup bc I can't take spice

Southwest America wrote:Ketchup or mustard?

Uhhh ketchup beats standard yellow mustard, but a good spicy tangy mustard beats ketchup any day on most things

4D Donkeys wrote:That sounds great, I would agree but I personally think that simply teaching people (mostly children) about physics of biological matter, Darwin's theories, The Scientific Method, etc would do the job better on guiding people out of religion than just straight up banning it for everyone.

In my nation, 4D Donkeys, religion isn't banned but a lot of the country's income is devoted to public education and now my country has an all-time high atheism rate, with even the most religious-dependant people becoming secular.

I can relate this to Lenin's policies in the early USSR, where he didn't ban religion, but he got 50% of the Russian population to be atheistic, and this was IN 1924! We can tell Lenin's strategy to help the people worked well here.

You are right, education in my nation is strongly focused on science as well, obviously

Post self-deleted by Hildegane.

«12. . .19,05019,05119,05219,05319,05419,05519,056. . .20,50920,510»

Advertisement