«12345678. . .3,2683,269»
(Same question as Libertas Liber) we are curious
@Egypt, thanks for the endorsement!
Liberation Resolution up in WA Security Council. Will the outcome matter that much?
Post self-deleted by Chlorine.
It’s appalling what happened to them but they really should have tried harder to protect their region. When the C.O.I.N. and Vanhanian Dominion was threatened we went to great lengths to protect our regions and the final outcome for us was to unite and let our old regions die then recreate them so they are not taken over by raiders. The region up for liberation has no founder now so if they wish to be a region they will have a very hard time. It comes down to the fact that that region had no founder, no WA delegate, and there for no protection. If they are liberated they will fall again I guarantee it and once again they will ask for liberation. My advice for them would be to found a new region and make sure the founder stays with the region and never leaves it. I know it sounds harsh but their liberation is also very small if they truly wished to be liberated I would have written more if I were them. My vote will be to vote yes but only because I hate raiders.
Post self-deleted by Chlorine.
I also have a problem with the person proposing it (Neutricland)because they are not even from the region being liberated but from Federal Islands and it looks as if they were never from it but they also have a very very large dislike for nations who are communist/socialist and the region that they are founder and WA delegate of raids regions who have socialist or communist tags. I think this behavior is extremely two faced. Liberate one region but raid other regions for their political views. The goal of protecting regions is noble but to turn around and attack others because of political views? It’s horrid. For this region I am now against this, I can’t see the reason of a outside force voting for a liberation while that same force raids my communist and socialist comrades.
After much research (and reworking our position) we have decided to vote against the resolution. What Vanhania brings up is true. The region is extremely vulnerable and was never a large region in the past either. Also it seems the "invader" nation never really invaded. Mizialand was a native to the region of the Hanseatic League for almost a year and held WA delegate for a period of time. The region lost its founder nation and grew very small and so they decided to disband and effectively delete the region by leaving and passwording it. The forum discussion of this resolution is also very interesting 
viewtopic.php?f=24&t=191052 . Agreeing again with Vanhania it appears the nation (Neutricland) who proposed it was never involved with the Hanseatic League at all. Looking at the proposer's region, he founded it (The Federal Islands) almost a year ago and has been there since. They are anti communist and socialists and it seems they sometimes consider raiding communist and socialist regions. So in a way it would seem more correct to condemn Neutricland for wasting the Security Council's time and resources. Going back to Mizialand, after effectively closing down the Hanseatic league, they moved to the Humanitarian League where they were banned for 1) due to the current SC resolution they could be an invader, and apparently 2) OOC homophobic abuse of some nation. Maybe both should be condemned... but more information is needed.
Very interesting discussion. I think it's convincing enough for the Republic to vote against the resolution.
Yeah, let's not help the hypocritical dogs. What room do they have to say that it's bad that this region was taken over yet they have taken over regions themselves and after reading their discussion board on their page they are currently planning to take a region right now. But let's not start a p*****g contest with them...
I agree but I sent a TG to the region that they were talking about and warned them. The region they were talking about is massive and has no need to fear them but they I warned them anyway.
You stole my idea! But I did it too XD
7/18/2012
The population and economic facts of the C.O.G.:
Population: 6,997,000,000 people in the C.O.G.
GDP of the C.O.G.: $80,876,222,283,776
By tomorrow we will have 7 billion people in the C.O.G.!!!! Good job everyone!
Vanhania... where do you find this information? :S
There is a web site that has the economic info of every country/region in nationstates haha I add up every nations population with a calculator and the website says the regional GDP haha here is the url of the C.O.G. http://www.broomdces.com/nseconomy/regions.php?region=The Coalition of Governments
Post self-deleted by Fraserland.
Post self-deleted by Fraserland.
Greetings to you all!
We are the free, armed and democratic people of Ulunia!
Ulunia is a colony of Apozoraia!
Greetings to the new found colony Ulunia of Apozoraia. May it ever grow and prosper.
Greetings!
We are a totalitarian socialist state that emphasizes labor, and provides free tenants and top quality health care for all of our citizens. We look forward to future diplomatic meetings with fellow leaders!
-USSO
Welcome USSO and Ulunia! Enjoy the region!
Welcome to the C.O.G. [nation[Caesar Beastlings[/nation]! I hope you love the region!
Hello im the king of Constra
«12345678. . .3,2683,269»
Advertisement