Search

Search

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .1,0621,0631,0641,0651,0661,0671,068. . .1,0941,095»

Just reached 5 Billion people
that’s means more military funding for me‼️‼️

Knights of LUSITANIA wrote:Reading an actual book or 20 would aid you better on your quest for knowledge. Something basic like Oswald Mosleys "Fascism for the Million" is a good introduction.
You can follow that with something from Evola like "The Bow and The Club" or "A Handbook for Right-Wing Youth".

Or directly The Doctrine of Fascism by Mussolini and Gentile themselves.

Republic of Labour and Virtue wrote:Or directly The Doctrine of Fascism by Mussolini and Gentile themselves.

Have you read For My Legionaries by Codreanu?

Roma Oriens wrote:Have you read For My Legionaries by Codreanu?

I've heard of Codreanu, but from that book no.
Also no, please no, I don't want to see the legionaries using meat hooks PLEASE

Songateri is a 6.3B nation that's been in this region for not even 2 months (83rd or 86th in residency rank btw) but he's got 90'000+ influence???

More than Cruciland who was our delegate for 1000+ days? or Atsuria who has been here for like 9 years?

Valve pls fix wtf

I'm 15.5B people so why is my influence not higher than his?

Tundra Terra wrote:I'm 15.5B people so why is my influence not higher than his?

A small % of influence is supposed to carry over from region to region, and slowly grow with endorsements. You're not in the WA, which severely hurts your daily influence growth especially next to everyone else who not only has WA but also has a handful of endorsements. IIRC it's 2 influence per endorsement every day (1 per 12 hours) + the daily 1 influence growth that everyone gets.

The issue here is that I cant possibly understand how Songateri has 90k at 6B citizens unless it is the result of formerly being a nation with like 300+ endorsements and the fruit of a nationstates calculation bug of some type. He isn't the first case of this we've witnessed but the last subject of this observation didnt stick around for more than a few days and was gone before we got to report on it.

Knights of LUSITANIA wrote:A small % of influence is supposed to carry over from region to region, and slowly grow with endorsements. You're not in the WA, which severely hurts your daily influence growth especially next to everyone else who not only has WA but also has a handful of endorsements. IIRC it's 2 influence per endorsement every day (1 per 12 hours) + the daily 1 influence growth that everyone gets.

The issue here is that I cant possibly understand how [nation][/nation] has 90k at 6B citizens unless it is the result of formerly being a nation with like 300+ endorsements and the fruit of a nationstates calculation bug of some type. He isn't the first case of this we've witnessed but the last subject of this observation didnt stick around for more than a few days and was gone before we got to report on it.

Looking at their endorsements, they were at around 40-50 for multiple years.

The influence display is also weird because it shows how their influence in the old region declines, until it matches their influence in the current region, where it starts to increase again.

Essentially, the display is their influence in their old region, and will count down at a certain rate day-by-day (I don’t know how that is calculated) until it matches their influence in this region, which is climbing at its own pace. Then it switches to displaying their influence in this region.

I think.

Carolina Sur wrote:Looking at their endorsements, they were at around 40-50 for multiple years.

The influence display is also weird because it shows how their influence in the old region declines, until it matches their influence in the current region, where it starts to increase again.

Essentially, the display is their influence in their old region, and will count down at a certain rate day-by-day (I don’t know how that is calculated) until it matches their influence in this region, which is climbing at its own pace. Then it switches to displaying their influence in this region.

I think.

THAT'S WHACK!

Knights of LUSITANIA wrote:THAT'S WHACK!

It's actually just the sum of all influence scores that the nation has, it doesn't switch.

Hilseris wrote:It's actually just the sum of all influence scores that the nation has, it doesn't switch.

That makes a lot more sense.

Knights of LUSITANIA wrote:You need to actually define larping b4 you post next time

No

Tundra Terra wrote:I'm 15.5B people so why is my influence not higher than his?

Good thing his defence spending is only 6,966.83

Post self-deleted by Jonasville.

Jonasville wrote:if anybody figures out this is my main’s puppet and they see I’m in a fascist region it might not go well for me


filtered

Knights of LUSITANIA wrote:
filtered

"I spent time amongst the enemy and all they did was sh*tpost and tell me to read books"

Should I stay in the WA? I prefer a more isolationist view. Also they're accusing me of breaking WA rules. However; I use this account typically at my college where there are thousands of students. So, possibly they're detecting by IP, which would be absurd if they barred me for that.

Roma Oriens wrote:Should I stay in the WA? I prefer a more isolationist view. Also they're accusing me of breaking WA rules. However; I use this account typically at my college where there are thousands of students. So, possibly they're detecting by IP, which would be absurd if they barred me for that.

Submit a help request explaining the situation.
IP isn't the only method of detecting multi-WA accounting so losing WA access over that is unlikely as long as they are notified. You're not the first NS user in college...

Staying in the WA is beneficial b/c it lets you add to the influence count of your region members as well as receive some in return. Isolationist or not, the WA is a hot garbage of a system in the sense that any resolution that *actually* affects gameplay (like a password removal, or a frontier injunction), go through and affect you directly whether or not you're a WA member/voted on it. So being in the WA or not being the WA is a choice between having a word at the table or just watching from afar whilst still suffering the consequences of its misuse.

I still refuse to be part of the WA after a literal decade for lore reasons.

Roma Oriens wrote:Should I stay in the WA? I prefer a more isolationist view. Also they're accusing me of breaking WA rules. However; I use this account typically at my college where there are thousands of students. So, possibly they're detecting by IP, which would be absurd if they barred me for that.

Why would you want to be part of an anti-fascist communist supergovernment?

Addlebrand wrote:Why would you want to be part of an anti-fascist communist supergovernment?

To keep an eye on it and establish a foothold. It's especially important when looking at the in-game effects of the Security Council.

Cruciland wrote:To keep an eye on it and establish a foothold. It's especially important when looking at the in-game effects of the Security Council.

From this day forward, the truth of you, my apprentice, now and forevermore, will be Darth Sidious.

I always panic when I log on and have lots of notifications because I can never remember what I've posted

Addlebrand wrote:Why would you want to be part of an anti-fascist communist supergovernment?

Same reason Russia is in the UN, some influence over something you hate that hates you is better than none. Worst case, you just ignore their silly little resolutions while forcing them to be bound to the ones that you push through with your own influence. Textbook Rules for Radicals.

The Korean Papal States wrote:Same reason Russia is in the UN, some influence over something you hate that hates you is better than none. Worst case, you just ignore their silly little resolutions while forcing them to be bound to the ones that you push through with your own influence. Textbook Rules for Radicals.

Russia is in the UN for the same reason the US is - they're a vassal state to the stateless money lenders.
In the real world, if you're not signed up the the UN and their resolutions, they don't apply to you. The only thing giving it legitimacy is participation.

«12. . .1,0621,0631,0641,0651,0661,0671,068. . .1,0941,095»

Advertisement